Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
For n>1 the exponent gcd and a real beta table classify and witness all positive root degrees. The unit n=1 has a separate uniform certificate for every positive degree. Zero is excluded. NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition is deliberately distinct from the unrelated polynomial definition.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ n. ¬n = 0 → ∃ x. ∃ y. NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition(n,x,y) ∧ (∀ z. ∀ m. NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition(n,z,m) → z = x ∧ m = y)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 28 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Establish hexistsL3–6
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply squarefree decomposition exists.
- L3
have hexists : ∃ r. ∃ s. NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition(n,r,s)Definitions: NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition(n,r,s)Original native command in the exact edition - L4
specialize squarefree_decomposition_exists (n) - L5
apply squarefree_decomposition_exists - L6
exact hn
03Separate the logical casesL7–8
04Construct an explicit witnessL9–10
05Separate the logical casesL11–11
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L11
split
06Use earlier factsL12–12
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L12
exact hexists_witness_witness
07Fix variables and assumptionsL13–15
08Separate the logical casesL16–17
09Use earlier factsL18–27
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L18
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (n) - L19
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x) - L20
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x1) - L21
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (u) - L22
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (v) - L23
apply squarefree_decomposition_functional - L24
exact hn - L25
exact hexists_witness_witness_left - L26
exact hother_left - L27
exact hexists_witness_witness_right
10Use earlier factsL28–28
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L28
exact hother_right
Original defined command ledger · 28 lines
- 0001
intro n - 0002
intro hn - 0003
have hexists : ∃ r. ∃ s. NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition(n,r,s) - 0004
specialize squarefree_decomposition_exists (n) - 0005
apply squarefree_decomposition_exists - 0006
exact hn - 0007
cases hexists - 0008
cases hexists_witness - 0009
exists x - 0010
exists x1 - 0011
split - 0012
exact hexists_witness_witness - 0013
intro u - 0014
intro v - 0015
intro hother - 0016
cases hexists_witness_witness - 0017
cases hother - 0018
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (n) - 0019
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x) - 0020
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x1) - 0021
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (u) - 0022
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (v) - 0023
apply squarefree_decomposition_functional - 0024
exact hn - 0025
exact hexists_witness_witness_left - 0026
exact hother_left - 0027
exact hexists_witness_witness_right - 0028
exact hother_right