Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall n. ~(n = 0) -> exists r s. (((((~((r) = 0)) /\ (forall sfd_prime_canonical_squarefreekernel. (~((sfd_prime_canonical_squarefreekernel) = 1) /\ forall pvs_left_canonical_squarefreekerneldomain pvs_right_canonical_squarefreekerneldomain. (sfd_prime_canonical_squarefreekernel) = pvs_left_canonical_squarefreekerneldomain * pvs_right_canonical_squarefreekerneldomain -> pvs_left_canonical_squarefreekerneldomain = 1 \/ pvs_right_canonical_squarefreekerneldomain = 1) -> (exists pvs_le_gap_canonical_squarefreekernelbound. pvs_le_gap_canonical_squarefreekernelbound + (sfd_prime_canonical_squarefreekernel) = (r)) -> ~(exists pvs_factor_canonical_squarefreekernelsquare. (r) = (sfd_prime_canonical_squarefreekernel * sfd_prime_canonical_squarefreekernel) * pvs_factor_canonical_squarefreekernelsquare)))) /\ ((n) = (r) * ((s) * (s))))) /\ forall u v. (((((~((u) = 0)) /\ (forall sfd_prime_other_squarefreekernel. (~((sfd_prime_other_squarefreekernel) = 1) /\ forall pvs_left_other_squarefreekerneldomain pvs_right_other_squarefreekerneldomain. (sfd_prime_other_squarefreekernel) = pvs_left_other_squarefreekerneldomain * pvs_right_other_squarefreekerneldomain -> pvs_left_other_squarefreekerneldomain = 1 \/ pvs_right_other_squarefreekerneldomain = 1) -> (exists pvs_le_gap_other_squarefreekernelbound. pvs_le_gap_other_squarefreekernelbound + (sfd_prime_other_squarefreekernel) = (u)) -> ~(exists pvs_factor_other_squarefreekernelsquare. (u) = (sfd_prime_other_squarefreekernel * sfd_prime_other_squarefreekernel) * pvs_factor_other_squarefreekernelsquare)))) /\ ((n) = (u) * ((v) * (v))))) -> u = r /\ v = sConstructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
For every positive n, construct n=r*s² with squarefree r and prove every other natural such pair is exactly (r,s), including n=1.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 28 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v29 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Establish hexistsL3–6
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply squarefree decomposition exists.
- L3
have hexists : ∃ r. ∃ s. NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition(n,r,s)Definitions: NaturalSquarefreeDecomposition - L4
specialize squarefree_decomposition_exists (n) - L5
apply squarefree_decomposition_exists - L6
exact hn
03Separate the logical casesL7–8
04Construct an explicit witnessL9–10
05Separate the logical casesL11–11
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L11
split
06Use earlier factsL12–12
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L12
exact hexists_witness_witness
07Fix variables and assumptionsL13–15
08Separate the logical casesL16–17
09Use earlier factsL18–27
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L18
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (n) - L19
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x) - L20
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x1) - L21
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (u) - L22
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (v) - L23
apply squarefree_decomposition_functional - L24
exact hn - L25
exact hexists_witness_witness_left - L26
exact hother_left - L27
exact hexists_witness_witness_right
10Use earlier factsL28–28
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L28
exact hother_right
Original exact command ledger · 28 lines
- 0001
intro n - 0002
intro hn - 0003
have hexists : exists r s. (((((~((r) = 0)) /\ (forall sfd_prime_canonical_existskernel. (~((sfd_prime_canonical_existskernel) = 1) /\ forall pvs_left_canonical_existskerneldomain pvs_right_canonical_existskerneldomain. (sfd_prime_canonical_existskernel) = pvs_left_canonical_existskerneldomain * pvs_right_canonical_existskerneldomain -> pvs_left_canonical_existskerneldomain = 1 \/ pvs_right_canonical_existskerneldomain = 1) -> (exists pvs_le_gap_canonical_existskernelbound. pvs_le_gap_canonical_existskernelbound + (sfd_prime_canonical_existskernel) = (r)) -> ~(exists pvs_factor_canonical_existskernelsquare. (r) = (sfd_prime_canonical_existskernel * sfd_prime_canonical_existskernel) * pvs_factor_canonical_existskernelsquare)))) /\ ((n) = (r) * ((s) * (s))))) - 0004
specialize squarefree_decomposition_exists (n) - 0005
apply squarefree_decomposition_exists - 0006
exact hn - 0007
cases hexists - 0008
cases hexists_witness - 0009
exists x - 0010
exists x1 - 0011
split - 0012
exact hexists_witness_witness - 0013
intro u - 0014
intro v - 0015
intro hother - 0016
cases hexists_witness_witness - 0017
cases hother - 0018
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (n) - 0019
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x) - 0020
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (x1) - 0021
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (u) - 0022
specialize squarefree_decomposition_functional (v) - 0023
apply squarefree_decomposition_functional - 0024
exact hn - 0025
exact hexists_witness_witness_left - 0026
exact hother_left - 0027
exact hexists_witness_witness_right - 0028
exact hother_right