Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Length is representation length, not polynomial degree. Leading zeros and the empty zero polynomial are allowed; the canonical argument guard x<p also applies to the empty case. Evaluation is defined by actual field-operation steps, not an assumed residue invariant. Polynomial division, gcd, irreducibles and general prime-power extension fields remain open; this does not close G091.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ p. ∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ l. BetaPrefixInto(b,c,l,p) → FpCoefficientReduction(p,b,c,b,c,l)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 23 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–7
02Establish haL8–11
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply h.
- L8
have ha : ∃ a. BetaAt(b,c,i,a) ∧ Lt(a,p)Definitions: BetaAt(b,c,i,a)Lt(a,p)Original native command in the exact edition - L9
specialize h (i) - L10
apply h - L11
exact hi
03Separate the logical casesL12–13
04Construct an explicit witnessL14–15
05Separate the logical casesL16–16
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L16
split
06Use earlier factsL17–17
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L17
exact ha_witness_left
07Separate the logical casesL18–18
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L18
split
Original defined command ledger · 23 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro c - 0004
intro l - 0005
intro h - 0006
intro i - 0007
intro hi - 0008
have ha : ∃ a. BetaAt(b,c,i,a) ∧ Lt(a,p) - 0009
specialize h (i) - 0010
apply h - 0011
exact hi - 0012
cases ha - 0013
cases ha_witness - 0014
exists x - 0015
exists x - 0016
split - 0017
exact ha_witness_left - 0018
split - 0019
exact ha_witness_left - 0020
specialize prime_field_residue_reflexive (p) - 0021
specialize prime_field_residue_reflexive (x) - 0022
apply prime_field_residue_reflexive - 0023
exact ha_witness_right