Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall p b c l. (forall fom_index_pfp_reflexive_source. (exists fom_gap_pfp_reflexive_source_index_bound. fom_gap_pfp_reflexive_source_index_bound + S (fom_index_pfp_reflexive_source) = l) -> exists fom_value_pfp_reflexive_source. ((((exists fom_beta_height_pfp_reflexive_source_entry. fom_beta_height_pfp_reflexive_source_entry + S (fom_value_pfp_reflexive_source) = S ((S (fom_index_pfp_reflexive_source)) * c)) /\ exists fom_beta_quotient_pfp_reflexive_source_entry. b = fom_beta_quotient_pfp_reflexive_source_entry * S ((S (fom_index_pfp_reflexive_source)) * c) + (fom_value_pfp_reflexive_source))) /\ (exists fom_gap_pfp_reflexive_source_value_bound. fom_gap_pfp_reflexive_source_value_bound + S (fom_value_pfp_reflexive_source) = p))) -> (forall pfp_index_reflexive_result. (exists pfa_gap_reflexive_resultindex. pfa_gap_reflexive_resultindex + S (pfp_index_reflexive_result) = (l)) -> exists pfp_source_reflexive_result pfp_residue_reflexive_result. ((((exists ff_h_pfp_reflexive_resultsource. ff_h_pfp_reflexive_resultsource + S (pfp_source_reflexive_result) = S ((S (pfp_index_reflexive_result)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_reflexive_resultsource. b = ff_q_pfp_reflexive_resultsource * S ((S (pfp_index_reflexive_result)) * c) + (pfp_source_reflexive_result))) /\ (((((exists ff_h_pfp_reflexive_resulttarget. ff_h_pfp_reflexive_resulttarget + S (pfp_residue_reflexive_result) = S ((S (pfp_index_reflexive_result)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_reflexive_resulttarget. b = ff_q_pfp_reflexive_resulttarget * S ((S (pfp_index_reflexive_result)) * c) + (pfp_residue_reflexive_result))) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_reflexive_resultresiduebound. pfa_gap_reflexive_resultresiduebound + S (pfp_residue_reflexive_result) = (p)) /\ ((exists pfa_offset_left_reflexive_resultresiduecongruence pfa_offset_right_reflexive_resultresiduecongruence. (pfp_source_reflexive_result) + (p) * pfa_offset_left_reflexive_resultresiduecongruence = (pfp_residue_reflexive_result) + (p) * pfa_offset_right_reflexive_resultresiduecongruence)))))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
A table already consisting of canonical coefficients normalizes to itself.
The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 23 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v31 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
prime_field_residue_reflexive Alpha theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–7
02Establish haL8–11
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply h.
- L8
have ha : exists a. ((((exists ff_h_pfp_reflexive_entry. ff_h_pfp_reflexive_entry + S (a) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_reflexive_entry. b = ff_q_pfp_reflexive_entry * S ((S (i)) * c) + (a))) /\ ((exists pfa_gap_reflexive_bound. pfa_gap_reflexive_bound + S (a) = (p)))) - L9
specialize h (i) - L10
apply h - L11
exact hi
03Separate the logical casesL12–13
04Construct an explicit witnessL14–15
05Separate the logical casesL16–16
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L16
split
06Use earlier factsL17–17
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L17
exact ha_witness_left
07Separate the logical casesL18–18
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L18
split
Original exact command ledger · 23 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro c - 0004
intro l - 0005
intro h - 0006
intro i - 0007
intro hi - 0008
have ha : exists a. ((((exists ff_h_pfp_reflexive_entry. ff_h_pfp_reflexive_entry + S (a) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_reflexive_entry. b = ff_q_pfp_reflexive_entry * S ((S (i)) * c) + (a))) /\ ((exists pfa_gap_reflexive_bound. pfa_gap_reflexive_bound + S (a) = (p)))) - 0009
specialize h (i) - 0010
apply h - 0011
exact hi - 0012
cases ha - 0013
cases ha_witness - 0014
exists x - 0015
exists x - 0016
split - 0017
exact ha_witness_left - 0018
split - 0019
exact ha_witness_left - 0020
specialize prime_field_residue_reflexive (p) - 0021
specialize prime_field_residue_reflexive (x) - 0022
apply prime_field_residue_reflexive - 0023
exact ha_witness_right