Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ k. ∀ a. ∀ b. ∀ c. ModEq(k,a + c,0) → ModEq(k,b + c,0) → ModEq(k,a,b)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This reading surface never changes the unchanged intuitionistic kernel or confers checked-use authority.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
In local proof propositions
Exact expanded first-order statement
forall k a b c. (exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_first ftcn_right_fssq_common_first. (a + c) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_first = (0) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_first) -> (exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_second ftcn_right_fssq_common_second. (b + c) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_second = (0) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_second) -> (exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_result ftcn_right_fssq_common_result. (a) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_result = (b) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_result)Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only propositions whose conservative expansion has been checked for exact first-order equivalence are compacted. Every changed line retains its immutable exact replay command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Establish hreverseL7–12
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mod eq symm.
- L7
have hreverse : ModEq(k,0,b + c)Definitions: ModEq(k,0,b + c)Original native command in the exact edition - L8
specialize mod_eq_symm k - L9
specialize mod_eq_symm (b + c) - L10
specialize mod_eq_symm 0 - L11
apply mod_eq_symm - L12
exact hsecond
03Establish hequalL13–22
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mod eq trans.
- L13
have hequal : ModEq(k,a + c,b + c)Definitions: ModEq(k,a + c,b + c)Original native command in the exact edition - L14
specialize mod_eq_trans k - L15
specialize mod_eq_trans (a + c) - L16
specialize mod_eq_trans 0 - L17
specialize mod_eq_trans (b + c) - L18
apply mod_eq_trans - L19
exact hfirst - L20
exact hreverse - L21
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right k - L22
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right a
Original defined command ledger · 26 lines
- 0001
intro k - 0002
intro a - 0003
intro b - 0004
intro c - 0005
intro hfirst - 0006
intro hsecond - 0007
have hreverse : ModEq(k,0,b + c)Exact native replay line
have hreverse : exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_reverse ftcn_right_fssq_common_reverse. (0) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_reverse = (b + c) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_reverse - 0008
specialize mod_eq_symm k - 0009
specialize mod_eq_symm (b + c) - 0010
specialize mod_eq_symm 0 - 0011
apply mod_eq_symm - 0012
exact hsecond - 0013
have hequal : ModEq(k,a + c,b + c)Exact native replay line
have hequal : exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_equal ftcn_right_fssq_common_equal. (a + c) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_equal = (b + c) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_equal - 0014
specialize mod_eq_trans k - 0015
specialize mod_eq_trans (a + c) - 0016
specialize mod_eq_trans 0 - 0017
specialize mod_eq_trans (b + c) - 0018
apply mod_eq_trans - 0019
exact hfirst - 0020
exact hreverse - 0021
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right k - 0022
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right a - 0023
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right b - 0024
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right c - 0025
apply mod_eq_add_cancel_right - 0026
exact hequal