Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall k a b c. (exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_first ftcn_right_fssq_common_first. (a + c) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_first = (0) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_first) -> (exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_second ftcn_right_fssq_common_second. (b + c) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_second = (0) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_second) -> (exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_result ftcn_right_fssq_common_result. (a) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_result = (b) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_result)Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Two modular zero balances with the same added natural term yield congruent remaining terms.
The unchanged tactic script uses 3 declared prerequisites and contains 26 exact native proof lines.
dependency-curried kernel-checked theorem body; Alpha enrollment and checked-use authority follow separately sealed release evidence; Stable membership remains unchanged
Historical empty-context replay experiment only; that experiment persisted no certificate and granted no release authority. Current checked use follows separately sealed, independently verified proof bundles; there is no Stable promotion.
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
mod_eq_symm Stable theorem; checked-use authorized mod_eq_trans Stable theorem; checked-use authorized mod_eq_add_cancel_right Alpha theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Establish hreverseL7–12
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mod eq symm.
03Establish hequalL13–22
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mod eq trans.
- L13
have hequal : exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_equal ftcn_right_fssq_common_equal. (a + c) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_equal = (b + c) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_equal - L14
specialize mod_eq_trans k - L15
specialize mod_eq_trans (a + c) - L16
specialize mod_eq_trans 0 - L17
specialize mod_eq_trans (b + c) - L18
apply mod_eq_trans - L19
exact hfirst - L20
exact hreverse - L21
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right k - L22
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right a
Original exact command ledger · 26 lines
- 0001
intro k - 0002
intro a - 0003
intro b - 0004
intro c - 0005
intro hfirst - 0006
intro hsecond - 0007
have hreverse : exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_reverse ftcn_right_fssq_common_reverse. (0) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_reverse = (b + c) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_reverse - 0008
specialize mod_eq_symm k - 0009
specialize mod_eq_symm (b + c) - 0010
specialize mod_eq_symm 0 - 0011
apply mod_eq_symm - 0012
exact hsecond - 0013
have hequal : exists ftcn_left_fssq_common_equal ftcn_right_fssq_common_equal. (a + c) + (k) * ftcn_left_fssq_common_equal = (b + c) + (k) * ftcn_right_fssq_common_equal - 0014
specialize mod_eq_trans k - 0015
specialize mod_eq_trans (a + c) - 0016
specialize mod_eq_trans 0 - 0017
specialize mod_eq_trans (b + c) - 0018
apply mod_eq_trans - 0019
exact hfirst - 0020
exact hreverse - 0021
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right k - 0022
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right a - 0023
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right b - 0024
specialize mod_eq_add_cancel_right c - 0025
apply mod_eq_add_cancel_right - 0026
exact hequal