FP0035

prime_field_negate_table_exists

Public research checkpoint, not admitted to Alpha or Stable. Alpha v30 remains 3222 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. The on-demand Alpha Lean service does not yet expose these checkpoint theorems; their independently checked literal bundles and unchanged sources are available below.

Construct every entry of the finite negate table from primality alone.

Public research checkpoint: original HA and independently compiled Lean verified; not Alpha-enrolled, no Alpha checked-use authority; not Stable

This checkpoint constructs prime-order fields (k=1), with genuine finite arithmetic tables, cardinality, and characteristic. Inversion is proved only for nonzero elements; the table's zero entry is a zero-to-zero convention. G091 for every prime power p^k, with an irreducible polynomial of degree k, remains open. No extension-field construction or G091 closure is claimed.

Exact theorem in conservative defined notation

∀ p. Prime(p) → ∃ x. ∃ y. FpNegPrefix(p,x,y,p)

Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.

Definition DAG

Actual proof prerequisites

Original expanded first-order statement
forall p. (~((p) = 1) /\ forall pfa_factor_left_negatetable_domain pfa_factor_right_negatetable_domain. (p) = pfa_factor_left_negatetable_domain * pfa_factor_right_negatetable_domain -> pfa_factor_left_negatetable_domain = 1 \/ pfa_factor_right_negatetable_domain = 1) -> exists b c. (forall pft_index_negatetable_result. (exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultprefix. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultprefix + S (pft_index_negatetable_result) = (p)) -> exists pft_value_negatetable_result. (((((exists ff_h_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry. ff_h_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry + S (pft_value_negatetable_result) = S ((S (pft_index_negatetable_result)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry. b = ff_q_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry * S ((S (pft_index_negatetable_result)) * c) + (pft_value_negatetable_result))) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionleft. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionleft + S (pft_index_negatetable_result) = (p)) /\ (((exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionright. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionright + S (pft_value_negatetable_result) = (p)) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultbound. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultbound + S (0) = (p)) /\ ((exists pfa_offset_left_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence pfa_offset_right_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence. ((pft_index_negatetable_result) + (pft_value_negatetable_result)) + (p) * pfa_offset_left_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence = (0) + (p) * pfa_offset_right_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence)))))))))))))

Complete tactic proof in conservative notation

All 12 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.

Read the argument

Proof checkpoints

12 script commands · 4 reading checkpoints · 0 local claims

This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.

Definition notation is shown below. Open the paired exact edition for the original native formulas. Source pairing is not a new equivalence certificate.

Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2

Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.

  1. L1
    intro p
  2. L2
    intro hp
02Use earlier factsL3–5

Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.

  1. L3
    specialize prime_field_negate_prefix_choice (p)
  2. L4
    specialize prime_field_negate_prefix_choice (p)
  3. L5
    apply prime_field_negate_prefix_choice
03Fix variables and assumptionsL6–7

Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.

  1. L6
    intro i
  2. L7
    intro hi
04Use earlier factsL8–12

Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.

  1. L8
    specialize prime_field_negate_exists (p)
  2. L9
    specialize prime_field_negate_exists (i)
  3. L10
    apply prime_field_negate_exists
  4. L11
    exact hp
  5. L12
    exact hi

Library-wide reading audit

Original defined command ledger · 12 lines
  1. 0001intro p
  2. 0002intro hp
  3. 0003specialize prime_field_negate_prefix_choice (p)
  4. 0004specialize prime_field_negate_prefix_choice (p)
  5. 0005apply prime_field_negate_prefix_choice
  6. 0006intro i
  7. 0007intro hi
  8. 0008specialize prime_field_negate_exists (p)
  9. 0009specialize prime_field_negate_exists (i)
  10. 0010apply prime_field_negate_exists
  11. 0011exact hp
  12. 0012exact hi