Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall p. (~((p) = 1) /\ forall pfa_factor_left_negatetable_domain pfa_factor_right_negatetable_domain. (p) = pfa_factor_left_negatetable_domain * pfa_factor_right_negatetable_domain -> pfa_factor_left_negatetable_domain = 1 \/ pfa_factor_right_negatetable_domain = 1) -> exists b c. (forall pft_index_negatetable_result. (exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultprefix. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultprefix + S (pft_index_negatetable_result) = (p)) -> exists pft_value_negatetable_result. (((((exists ff_h_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry. ff_h_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry + S (pft_value_negatetable_result) = S ((S (pft_index_negatetable_result)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry. b = ff_q_pft_negatetable_resultpointentry * S ((S (pft_index_negatetable_result)) * c) + (pft_value_negatetable_result))) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionleft. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionleft + S (pft_index_negatetable_result) = (p)) /\ (((exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionright. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionright + S (pft_value_negatetable_result) = (p)) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultbound. pfa_gap_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultbound + S (0) = (p)) /\ ((exists pfa_offset_left_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence pfa_offset_right_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence. ((pft_index_negatetable_result) + (pft_value_negatetable_result)) + (p) * pfa_offset_left_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence = (0) + (p) * pfa_offset_right_negatetable_resultpointvalueadditionresultcongruence)))))))))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Construct every entry of the finite negate table from primality alone.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 12 exact native proof lines.
Public research checkpoint: original HA and independently compiled Lean verified; not Alpha-enrolled, no Alpha checked-use authority; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. The literal dependency-closed bundle is checked by original HA and the independently compiled Lean verifier. Public delivery grants no Alpha checked-use authority or Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Use earlier factsL3–5
03Fix variables and assumptionsL6–7
Original exact command ledger · 12 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro hp - 0003
specialize prime_field_negate_prefix_choice (p) - 0004
specialize prime_field_negate_prefix_choice (p) - 0005
apply prime_field_negate_prefix_choice - 0006
intro i - 0007
intro hi - 0008
specialize prime_field_negate_exists (p) - 0009
specialize prime_field_negate_exists (i) - 0010
apply prime_field_negate_exists - 0011
exact hp - 0012
exact hi