Exact expanded PA statement
forall p r m. (exists sdp_odd_prime_like_modulus. p = 2 * sdp_odd_prime_like_modulus + 1) -> r + m = p -> (exists sdp_u_reflected_remainder sdp_v_reflected_remainder. (r) + 2 * sdp_u_reflected_remainder = (m + 1) + 2 * sdp_v_reflected_remainder)Structural proof guide
Generated structural guide
Reflecting two remainders across an odd modulus flips parity.
Use the direct prerequisites add_assoc, add_comm, mul_comm, zero_add, add_succ_left as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (1), intermediate claims (1), equality transport (2), certified simplification (2).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Alpha-v16 checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed; it is not a Stable theorem.
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro r - 0003
intro m - 0004
intro hp - 0005
intro hreflect - 0006
cases hp - 0007
have hdouble : 2 * m = m + m - 0008
trans m * 2 - 0009
apply mul_comm - 0010
simp [zero_add] - 0011
exists m - 0012
exists x - 0013
trans r + (m + m) - 0014
congr - 0015
refl - 0016
exact hdouble - 0017
trans (r + m) + m - 0018
symm - 0019
apply add_assoc - 0020
trans p + m - 0021
rewrite hreflect - 0022
refl - 0023
trans (2 * x + 1) + m - 0024
rewrite hp_witness - 0025
refl - 0026
simp [add_assoc, add_comm] - 0027
apply add_succ_left