Exact expanded PA statement
forall p k m t. p = S k -> t + m = p -> (exists wpp_mod_left_gsd_predecessor_mod wpp_mod_right_gsd_predecessor_mod. (k * m) + p * wpp_mod_left_gsd_predecessor_mod = (t) + p * wpp_mod_right_gsd_predecessor_mod)Structural proof guide
Generated structural guide
The predecessor multiplier is congruent to the complementary remainder.
Use the direct prerequisites mul_one, mul_succ_left, add_assoc, add_comm as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by certified simplification (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Alpha-v16 checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed; it is not a Stable theorem.
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro k - 0003
intro m - 0004
intro t - 0005
intro hp - 0006
intro hsum - 0007
exists 1 - 0008
exists m - 0009
trans k * m + p - 0010
congr - 0011
refl - 0012
apply mul_one - 0013
trans k * m + (t + m) - 0014
congr - 0015
refl - 0016
symm - 0017
exact hsum - 0018
trans t + (k * m + m) - 0019
simp [add_assoc, add_comm] - 0020
trans t + (S k) * m - 0021
congr - 0022
refl - 0023
symm - 0024
apply mul_succ_left - 0025
congr - 0026
refl - 0027
congr - 0028
symm - 0029
exact hp - 0030
refl