Exact expanded PA statement
forall a b c. (exists k. k + S a = b) -> (exists k. k + S b = c) -> exists k. k + S a = cStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
Strict order is transitive.
Use the direct prerequisites add_assoc, add_succ_left as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (2).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
- 0001
intro a - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro c - 0004
intro hab - 0005
intro hbc - 0006
cases hab - 0007
cases hbc - 0008
exists x1 + S x - 0009
trans x1 + (S x + S a) - 0010
apply add_assoc - 0011
trans x1 + S (x + S a) - 0012
congr - 0013
refl - 0014
apply add_succ_left - 0015
trans x1 + S b - 0016
congr - 0017
refl - 0018
congr - 0019
exact hab_witness - 0020
exact hbc_witness