Exact expanded PA statement
forall n m. n <= m -> m <= n -> n = mStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
The witness-defined order is antisymmetric.
Use the direct prerequisites antisymm_from_witnesses as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (2).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.