Exact expanded PA statement
forall b c n. n = 0 -> (forall fp_value_zero. (exists fp_gap_zero_value. fp_gap_zero_value + S fp_value_zero = n) -> exists fp_i_zero. ((exists fp_gap_zero_index. fp_gap_zero_index + S fp_i_zero = n) /\ (((exists ff_h_zero_entry. ff_h_zero_entry + S (fp_value_zero) = S ((S (fp_i_zero)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_zero_entry. b = ff_q_zero_entry * S ((S (fp_i_zero)) * c) + (fp_value_zero)))))Structural proof guide
Generated structural guide
The empty decoded prefix is surjective onto the empty interval.
Use the direct prerequisites add_eq_zero_right, succ_ne_zero as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (1), intermediate claims (1), equality transport (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro n - 0004
intro hn - 0005
intro y - 0006
intro hy - 0007
rewrite hn at hy - 0008
exfalso - 0009
cases hy - 0010
have hsy : S y = 0 - 0011
specialize add_eq_zero_right x - 0012
specialize add_eq_zero_right (S y) - 0013
apply add_eq_zero_right - 0014
exact hy_witness - 0015
specialize succ_ne_zero y - 0016
apply succ_ne_zero - 0017
exact hsy