Exact expanded PA statement
forall b c a l i x. (forall ff_i_entry. (exists ff_lt_entry_bound. ff_lt_entry_bound + S ff_i_entry = l) -> (((exists ff_h_entry_decoded. ff_h_entry_decoded + S (a) = S ((S (ff_i_entry)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_entry_decoded. b = ff_q_entry_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_entry)) * c) + (a)))) -> (exists h. h + S i = l) -> (((exists ff_h_entry_x. ff_h_entry_x + S (x) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_entry_x. b = ff_q_entry_x * S ((S (i)) * c) + (x))) -> x = aStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
Every decoded entry of a Repeat prefix equals its repeated value.
Use the direct prerequisites beta_at_unique as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by intermediate claims (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro a - 0004
intro l - 0005
intro i - 0006
intro x - 0007
intro hrepeat - 0008
intro hi - 0009
intro hx - 0010
have ha : ((exists h. h + S a = S ((S i) * c)) /\ exists q. b = q * S ((S i) * c) + a) - 0011
specialize hrepeat i - 0012
apply hrepeat - 0013
exact hi - 0014
specialize beta_at_unique b - 0015
specialize beta_at_unique c - 0016
specialize beta_at_unique i - 0017
specialize beta_at_unique x - 0018
specialize beta_at_unique a - 0019
apply beta_at_unique - 0020
exact hx - 0021
exact ha