Exact expanded PA statement
forall b c l. (forall ff_i_a. (exists ff_lt_a_bound. ff_lt_a_bound + S ff_i_a = l) -> exists ff_bit_a. ((((exists ff_h_a_decoded. ff_h_a_decoded + S (ff_bit_a) = S ((S (ff_i_a)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_a_decoded. b = ff_q_a_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_a)) * c) + (ff_bit_a))) /\ (ff_bit_a = 0 \/ ff_bit_a = 1))) -> exists n. (((exists ff_u_b_sum ff_v_b_sum. ((((exists ff_h_b_sum_start. ff_h_b_sum_start + S (0) = S ((S (0)) * ff_v_b_sum)) /\ exists ff_q_b_sum_start. ff_u_b_sum = ff_q_b_sum_start * S ((S (0)) * ff_v_b_sum) + (0))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_b_sum_terminal. ff_h_b_sum_terminal + S (n) = S ((S (l)) * ff_v_b_sum)) /\ exists ff_q_b_sum_terminal. ff_u_b_sum = ff_q_b_sum_terminal * S ((S (l)) * ff_v_b_sum) + (n))) /\ forall ff_i_b_sum. (exists ff_lt_b_sum_bound. ff_lt_b_sum_bound + S ff_i_b_sum = l) -> exists ff_a_b_sum ff_r_b_sum ff_s_b_sum. ((((exists ff_h_b_sum_summand. ff_h_b_sum_summand + S (ff_a_b_sum) = S ((S (ff_i_b_sum)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_b_sum_summand. b = ff_q_b_sum_summand * S ((S (ff_i_b_sum)) * c) + (ff_a_b_sum))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_b_sum_partial. ff_h_b_sum_partial + S (ff_r_b_sum) = S ((S (ff_i_b_sum)) * ff_v_b_sum)) /\ exists ff_q_b_sum_partial. ff_u_b_sum = ff_q_b_sum_partial * S ((S (ff_i_b_sum)) * ff_v_b_sum) + (ff_r_b_sum))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_b_sum_successor. ff_h_b_sum_successor + S (ff_s_b_sum) = S ((S (S ff_i_b_sum)) * ff_v_b_sum)) /\ exists ff_q_b_sum_successor. ff_u_b_sum = ff_q_b_sum_successor * S ((S (S ff_i_b_sum)) * ff_v_b_sum) + (ff_s_b_sum))) /\ ff_s_b_sum = ff_r_b_sum + ff_a_b_sum)))))) /\ (forall ff_i_b_bits. (exists ff_lt_b_bits_bound. ff_lt_b_bits_bound + S ff_i_b_bits = l) -> exists ff_bit_b_bits. ((((exists ff_h_b_bits_decoded. ff_h_b_bits_decoded + S (ff_bit_b_bits) = S ((S (ff_i_b_bits)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_b_bits_decoded. b = ff_q_b_bits_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_b_bits)) * c) + (ff_bit_b_bits))) /\ (ff_bit_b_bits = 0 \/ ff_bit_b_bits = 1)))))Structural proof guide
Generated structural guide
Every all-bits prefix has a relational count of its ones.
Use the direct prerequisites beta_sum_exists as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro l - 0004
intro hbits - 0005
specialize beta_sum_exists b - 0006
specialize beta_sum_exists c - 0007
specialize beta_sum_exists l - 0008
cases beta_sum_exists - 0009
exists x - 0010
split - 0011
exact beta_sum_exists_witness - 0012
exact hbits