Exact expanded PA statement
forall a b. (((exists x. a = 1 * x) /\ (exists y. b = 1 * y)) /\ forall d. (exists u. a = d * u) -> (exists v. b = d * v) -> exists w. 1 = d * w) -> forall c. (exists u. a = c * u) -> (exists v. b = c * v) -> c = 1Structural proof guide
Generated structural guide
A relational gcd witness one implies expanded coprimality.
Use the direct prerequisites divisor_one as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (1), intermediate claims (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.