PA0037

is_gcd_one_to_coprime

Stable checked-use theorem · independently closed

A relational gcd witness one implies expanded coprimality.

Exact expanded PA statement

forall a b. (((exists x. a = 1 * x) /\ (exists y. b = 1 * y)) /\ forall d. (exists u. a = d * u) -> (exists v. b = d * v) -> exists w. 1 = d * w) -> forall c. (exists u. a = c * u) -> (exists v. b = c * v) -> c = 1

Structural proof guide

Generated structural guide

A relational gcd witness one implies expanded coprimality.

Use the direct prerequisites divisor_one as previously established PA formulas.

The proof proceeds by case analysis (1), intermediate claims (1).

Referenced ingredients

Proof neighborhood

Direct dependencies

Direct dependents

Formal native tactic body

Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.

  1. 0001intro a
  2. 0002intro b
  3. 0003intro hg
  4. 0004intro c
  5. 0005intro ha
  6. 0006intro hb
  7. 0007cases hg
  8. 0008specialize hg_right c
  9. 0009have hd : exists w. 1 = c * w
  10. 0010apply hg_right
  11. 0011exact ha
  12. 0012exact hb
  13. 0013specialize divisor_one c
  14. 0014apply divisor_one
  15. 0015exact hd