Exact expanded PA statement
forall m P x a. (exists k. P = m * k) -> (exists u v. x + P * u = a + P * v) -> exists r s. x + m * r = a + m * sStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
Balanced congruence descends from a multiple modulus to every divisor modulus.
Use the direct prerequisites mul_assoc as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (3), equality transport (2).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
- 0001
intro m - 0002
intro P - 0003
intro x - 0004
intro a - 0005
intro hdiv - 0006
intro hmod - 0007
cases hdiv - 0008
cases hmod - 0009
cases hmod_witness - 0010
rewrite hdiv_witness at hmod_witness_witness - 0011
rewrite hdiv_witness at hmod_witness_witness - 0012
exists x1 * x2 - 0013
exists x1 * x3 - 0014
trans x + (m * x1) * x2 - 0015
congr - 0016
refl - 0017
symm - 0018
apply mul_assoc - 0019
trans a + (m * x1) * x3 - 0020
exact hmod_witness_witness - 0021
congr - 0022
refl - 0023
apply mul_assoc