Exact expanded PA statement
forall a b. (exists k. k + S a = b) -> exists r. r + a = bStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
A witnessed strict inequality entails the corresponding weak inequality.
Use the direct prerequisites add_succ_left as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
PA001U beta_exclusive_accumulated_product_step PA002G beta_exclusive_recode_congruence_step PA008B prime_mul_index_map_exists_up_to PA008S prime_scaled_inverse_prefix_exists_bounded PA009Q pair_index_left_below_double PA00A6 prime_inverse_prefix_exists_bounded PA00D9 distinct_odd_prime_half_cell_orientedFormal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.