Exact expanded PA statement
forall a b c d e f. ((a + b) + (c + d)) + (e + f) = (a + e) + ((b + c) + (d + f))Structural proof guide
Normalize the six addends used by the 163-to-317 cover.
Direct prerequisites: add_assoc, bertrand_add_swap_nested. The authored body proceeds by direct introduction and elimination.
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.
- 0001
intro a - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro c - 0004
intro d - 0005
intro e - 0006
intro f - 0007
trans (a + (b + (c + d))) + (e + f) - 0008
congr - 0009
apply add_assoc - 0010
refl - 0011
trans a + ((b + (c + d)) + (e + f)) - 0012
apply add_assoc - 0013
trans a + (b + ((c + d) + (e + f))) - 0014
congr - 0015
refl - 0016
apply add_assoc - 0017
trans a + (b + (c + (d + (e + f)))) - 0018
congr - 0019
refl - 0020
congr - 0021
refl - 0022
apply add_assoc - 0023
trans a + (b + (c + (e + (d + f)))) - 0024
congr - 0025
refl - 0026
congr - 0027
refl - 0028
congr - 0029
refl - 0030
apply bertrand_add_swap_nested - 0031
trans a + (b + (e + (c + (d + f)))) - 0032
congr - 0033
refl - 0034
congr - 0035
refl - 0036
apply bertrand_add_swap_nested - 0037
trans a + (e + (b + (c + (d + f)))) - 0038
congr - 0039
refl - 0040
apply bertrand_add_swap_nested - 0041
trans (a + e) + (b + (c + (d + f))) - 0042
symm - 0043
apply add_assoc - 0044
trans (a + e) + ((b + c) + (d + f)) - 0045
congr - 0046
refl - 0047
symm - 0048
apply add_assoc - 0049
refl