BT011B

nonzero_remainder_not_multiple

Alpha body-checked ยท checked-use disabled

A nonzero proper remainder refutes divisibility.

Exact expanded PA statement

forall d n q r. n = d * q + r -> ~(r = 0) -> (exists bpr_gap_bb8rn_lt. bpr_gap_bb8rn_lt + S (r) = d) -> ~(exists bpr_quotient_bb8rn_divides. n = (d) * bpr_quotient_bb8rn_divides)

Structural proof guide

A nonzero proper remainder refutes divisibility.

Direct prerequisites: multiple_refl, divides_remainder, divisor_le_nonzero, lt_not_le. The authored body proceeds by intermediate claims (3).

Proof neighborhood

Direct dependencies

Direct dependents

Formal native tactic body

Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.

  1. 0001intro d
  2. 0002intro n
  3. 0003intro q
  4. 0004intro r
  5. 0005intro heq
  6. 0006intro hr0
  7. 0007intro hlt
  8. 0008intro hdivides
  9. 0009have hself : exists u. d = d * u
  10. 0010specialize multiple_refl d
  11. 0011exact multiple_refl
  12. 0012have hrem : exists u. r = d * u
  13. 0013specialize divides_remainder d
  14. 0014specialize divides_remainder n
  15. 0015specialize divides_remainder d
  16. 0016specialize divides_remainder q
  17. 0017specialize divides_remainder r
  18. 0018apply divides_remainder
  19. 0019exact hdivides
  20. 0020exact hself
  21. 0021exact heq
  22. 0022have hle : exists k. k + d = r
  23. 0023specialize divisor_le_nonzero d
  24. 0024specialize divisor_le_nonzero r
  25. 0025apply divisor_le_nonzero
  26. 0026exact hr0
  27. 0027exact hrem
  28. 0028specialize lt_not_le r
  29. 0029specialize lt_not_le d
  30. 0030apply lt_not_le
  31. 0031exact hlt
  32. 0032exact hle