Exact expanded PA statement
forall n s q r. (exists bcf_lt_gap_b5rbfsltq_positive. bcf_lt_gap_b5rbfsltq_positive + S (2) = n) -> (((exists bcs_sqrt_lower_gap_b5rbfsltq_floor. bcs_sqrt_lower_gap_b5rbfsltq_floor + (s) * (s) = (n + n)) /\ exists bcs_sqrt_upper_gap_b5rbfsltq_floor. bcs_sqrt_upper_gap_b5rbfsltq_floor + S (n + n) = S (s) * S (s))) -> (((n + n) = (3) * (q) + (r) /\ (exists bcf_lt_gap_b5rbfsltq_division_bound. bcf_lt_gap_b5rbfsltq_division_bound + S (r) = 3))) -> exists g h. s + g = q /\ q + h = n + nStructural proof guide
Package the two exact additive gaps used by the three-range split.
Direct prerequisites: floor_sqrt_third_quotient_gap_exists, third_quotient_double_gap_exists. The authored body proceeds by case analysis (2), intermediate claims (2).
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.
- 0001
intro n - 0002
intro s - 0003
intro q - 0004
intro r - 0005
intro hpositive - 0006
intro hfloor - 0007
intro hdivision - 0008
have hfirst : exists g. s + g = q - 0009
specialize floor_sqrt_third_quotient_gap_exists n - 0010
specialize floor_sqrt_third_quotient_gap_exists s - 0011
specialize floor_sqrt_third_quotient_gap_exists q - 0012
specialize floor_sqrt_third_quotient_gap_exists r - 0013
apply floor_sqrt_third_quotient_gap_exists - 0014
exact hpositive - 0015
exact hfloor - 0016
exact hdivision - 0017
cases hfirst - 0018
have hsecond : exists h. q + h = n + n - 0019
specialize third_quotient_double_gap_exists n - 0020
specialize third_quotient_double_gap_exists q - 0021
specialize third_quotient_double_gap_exists r - 0022
apply third_quotient_double_gap_exists - 0023
exact hdivision - 0024
cases hsecond - 0025
exists x - 0026
exists x1 - 0027
split - 0028
exact hfirst_witness - 0029
exact hsecond_witness