Exact expanded PA statement
forall x k e. (((exists bcs_lower_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_source. bcs_lower_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_source + (x) = 6 * (e)) /\ exists bcs_upper_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_source. bcs_upper_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_source + S (6 * (e)) = (x) + 6)) -> (exists bqb_le_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_scaled. bqb_le_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_scaled + (6 * k) = (x)) -> (exists bqb_le_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_result. bqb_le_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_result + (k) = (e))Structural proof guide
A scaled lower bound cancels against the lower half of CeilDivSix.
Direct prerequisites: le_trans, succ_ne_zero, mul_le_cancel_left_nonzero. The authored body proceeds by case analysis (1), intermediate claims (1).
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.
- 0001
intro x - 0002
intro k - 0003
intro e - 0004
intro hceiling - 0005
intro hscaled - 0006
cases hceiling - 0007
have hscaled_to_ceiling : exists bqb_le_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_chain. bqb_le_gap_hj32_ceil_budget_chain + (6 * k) = (6 * e) - 0008
specialize le_trans (6 * k) - 0009
specialize le_trans x - 0010
specialize le_trans (6 * e) - 0011
apply le_trans - 0012
exact hscaled - 0013
exact hceiling_left - 0014
specialize mul_le_cancel_left_nonzero 6 - 0015
specialize mul_le_cancel_left_nonzero k - 0016
specialize mul_le_cancel_left_nonzero e - 0017
apply mul_le_cancel_left_nonzero - 0018
specialize succ_ne_zero 5 - 0019
exact succ_ne_zero - 0020
exact hscaled_to_ceiling