Exact expanded PA statement
forall n q r. (((2 * (n) = 3 * (q) + (r)) /\ exists bqb_remainder_gap_canonical_source. bqb_remainder_gap_canonical_source + S (r) = 3)) -> exists c. (((((q) + (c) = (n)) /\ exists bqb_budget_gap_canonical_result. bqb_budget_gap_canonical_result + 2 * (n) = 6 * (c))) /\ exists bqb_remainder_gap_canonical_preserved. bqb_remainder_gap_canonical_preserved + S r = 3)Structural proof guide
Canonical remainder data yields and preserves the complement budget.
Direct prerequisites: double_triple_remainder_complement_budget. The authored body proceeds by case analysis (2), intermediate claims (1).
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.
- 0001
intro n - 0002
intro q - 0003
intro r - 0004
intro hcanonical - 0005
cases hcanonical - 0006
have hbase : exists c. ((((q) + (c) = (n)) /\ exists bqb_budget_gap_canonical_base. bqb_budget_gap_canonical_base + 2 * (n) = 6 * (c))) - 0007
specialize double_triple_remainder_complement_budget n - 0008
specialize double_triple_remainder_complement_budget q - 0009
specialize double_triple_remainder_complement_budget r - 0010
apply double_triple_remainder_complement_budget - 0011
exact hcanonical_left - 0012
cases hbase - 0013
exists x - 0014
split - 0015
exact hbase_witness - 0016
exact hcanonical_right