Exact expanded PA statement
forall p. ((~(p = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_bpvl_prime frm_prime_right_bpvl_prime. p = frm_prime_left_bpvl_prime * frm_prime_right_bpvl_prime -> frm_prime_left_bpvl_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_bpvl_prime = 1)) -> (exists bpvl_gap_prime_two. bpvl_gap_prime_two + (2) = (p))Structural proof guide
Every prime is at least two in witness-defined order.
Direct prerequisites: prime_is_succ_succ. The authored body proceeds by case analysis (1), intermediate claims (1), equality transport (3).
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.