Exact expanded PA statement
forall b s C j. ~(C = 0) -> exists h. h + S s = S ((S j) * (C * S (b + s)))Structural proof guide
The appended value fits every modulus after the same constructive scaled-base rebase.
Direct prerequisites: le_add_left, succ_le_succ, le_scaled_nonzero, le_trans, base_le_beta_modulus. The authored body proceeds by intermediate claims (5).
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
BT0012 le_add_left BT0016 succ_le_succ BT0055 le_scaled_nonzero BT000F le_trans BT0054 base_le_beta_modulusDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro s - 0003
intro C - 0004
intro j - 0005
intro hC - 0006
have hsb : exists h. h + s = b + s - 0007
specialize le_add_left s - 0008
specialize le_add_left b - 0009
exact le_add_left - 0010
have hss : exists h. h + S s = S (b + s) - 0011
specialize succ_le_succ s - 0012
specialize succ_le_succ (b + s) - 0013
apply succ_le_succ - 0014
exact hsb - 0015
have hscale : exists h. h + S (b + s) = C * S (b + s) - 0016
specialize le_scaled_nonzero C - 0017
specialize le_scaled_nonzero (S (b + s)) - 0018
apply le_scaled_nonzero - 0019
exact hC - 0020
have hsbase : exists h. h + S s = C * S (b + s) - 0021
specialize le_trans (S s) - 0022
specialize le_trans (S (b + s)) - 0023
specialize le_trans (C * S (b + s)) - 0024
apply le_trans - 0025
exact hss - 0026
exact hscale - 0027
have hmod : exists h. h + C * S (b + s) = S ((S j) * (C * S (b + s))) - 0028
specialize base_le_beta_modulus (C * S (b + s)) - 0029
specialize base_le_beta_modulus j - 0030
exact base_le_beta_modulus - 0031
specialize le_trans (S s) - 0032
specialize le_trans (C * S (b + s)) - 0033
specialize le_trans (S ((S j) * (C * S (b + s)))) - 0034
apply le_trans - 0035
exact hsbase - 0036
exact hmod