Exact expanded PA statement
forall n m. n <= m -> m <= n -> n = mStructural proof guide
The witness-defined order is antisymmetric.
Direct prerequisites: antisymm_from_witnesses. The authored body proceeds by case analysis (2).
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of this body receipt. The focused endpoint audits separately check the complete empty-context certificates.