TS0012

multiple_implies_balanced_zero_congruence

Alpha v34 independently verified · alpha_closed; checked-use authorized; not Stable

Every witnessed natural multiple is balanced-congruent to zero.

Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.

Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement

forall p n. (exists ftcn_factor_multiple_source. (n) = (p) * ftcn_factor_multiple_source) -> (exists ftcn_left_multiple_result ftcn_right_multiple_result. (n) + (p) * ftcn_left_multiple_result = (0) + (p) * ftcn_right_multiple_result)

Constructive proof overview

Generated structural guide

Every witnessed natural multiple is balanced-congruent to zero.

The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 8 exact native proof lines.

dependency-curried kernel-checked theorem body; Alpha enrollment and checked-use authority follow separately sealed release evidence; Stable membership remains unchanged

Historical empty-context replay experiment only; that experiment persisted no certificate and granted no release authority. Current checked use follows separately sealed, independently verified proof bundles; there is no Stable promotion.

Proof neighborhood

Direct dependencies

zero_add Stable theorem; checked-use authorized

Direct dependents

Formal native tactic body

Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.

Read the argument

Proof checkpoints

8 script commands · 4 reading checkpoints · 0 local claims

This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.

01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3

Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.

  1. L1
    intro p
  2. L2
    intro n
  3. L3
    intro hmultiple
02Separate the logical casesL4–4

Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.

  1. L4
    cases hmultiple
03Construct an explicit witnessL5–6

Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.

  1. L5
    exists 0
  2. L6
    exists x
04Calculate and transport equalitiesL7–8

Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.

  1. L7
    rewrite hmultiple_witness
  2. L8
    simp [zero_add]

Library-wide reading audit

Original exact command ledger · 8 lines
  1. 0001intro p
  2. 0002intro n
  3. 0003intro hmultiple
  4. 0004cases hmultiple
  5. 0005exists 0
  6. 0006exists x
  7. 0007rewrite hmultiple_witness
  8. 0008simp [zero_add]