Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ p. ∀ n. p = S n → Prime(p) → Odd(p) → Mod4Three(p) → ¬QRes(p,n)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This reading surface never changes the unchanged intuitionistic kernel or confers checked-use authority.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
In local proof propositions
Exact expanded first-order statement
forall p n. p = S n -> ((~(p = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_ftsc_prime frm_prime_right_ftsc_prime. p = frm_prime_left_ftsc_prime * frm_prime_right_ftsc_prime -> frm_prime_left_ftsc_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_ftsc_prime = 1)) -> (exists ftsc_odd_ftsc_prime. (p) = 2 * ftsc_odd_ftsc_prime + 1) -> (exists ftsc_four_three_ftsc_prime. (p) = 4 * ftsc_four_three_ftsc_prime + 3) -> ~(exists qr_x_ftsc_predecessor. exists qr_u_ftsc_predecessor qr_v_ftsc_predecessor. qr_x_ftsc_predecessor * qr_x_ftsc_predecessor + p * qr_u_ftsc_predecessor = n + p * qr_v_ftsc_predecessor)Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only propositions whose conservative expansion has been checked for exact first-order equivalence are compacted. Every changed line retains its immutable exact replay command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Establish hlawL7–13
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply quadratic supplement minus one nonresidue iff mod four three.
- L7
have hlaw : (¬QRes(p,n) → Mod4Three(p)) ∧ (Mod4Three(p) → ¬QRes(p,n))Definitions: QRes(p,n)Mod4Three(p)Original native command in the exact edition - L8
specialize quadratic_supplement_minus_one_nonresidue_iff_mod_four_three p - L9
specialize quadratic_supplement_minus_one_nonresidue_iff_mod_four_three n - L10
apply quadratic_supplement_minus_one_nonresidue_iff_mod_four_three - L11
exact hpredecessor - L12
exact hprime - L13
exact hodd
03Separate the logical casesL14–14
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L14
cases hlaw
04Fix variables and assumptionsL15–15
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L15
intro hresidue
Original defined command ledger · 18 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro n - 0003
intro hpredecessor - 0004
intro hprime - 0005
intro hodd - 0006
intro hthree - 0007
have hlaw : (¬QRes(p,n) → Mod4Three(p)) ∧ (Mod4Three(p) → ¬QRes(p,n))Exact native replay line
have hlaw : ((~(exists qr_x_ftsc_predecessor. exists qr_u_ftsc_predecessor qr_v_ftsc_predecessor. qr_x_ftsc_predecessor * qr_x_ftsc_predecessor + p * qr_u_ftsc_predecessor = n + p * qr_v_ftsc_predecessor) -> (exists ftsc_four_three_ftsc_prime. (p) = 4 * ftsc_four_three_ftsc_prime + 3)) /\ ((exists ftsc_four_three_ftsc_prime. (p) = 4 * ftsc_four_three_ftsc_prime + 3) -> ~(exists qr_x_ftsc_predecessor. exists qr_u_ftsc_predecessor qr_v_ftsc_predecessor. qr_x_ftsc_predecessor * qr_x_ftsc_predecessor + p * qr_u_ftsc_predecessor = n + p * qr_v_ftsc_predecessor))) - 0008
specialize quadratic_supplement_minus_one_nonresidue_iff_mod_four_three p - 0009
specialize quadratic_supplement_minus_one_nonresidue_iff_mod_four_three n - 0010
apply quadratic_supplement_minus_one_nonresidue_iff_mod_four_three - 0011
exact hpredecessor - 0012
exact hprime - 0013
exact hodd - 0014
cases hlaw - 0015
intro hresidue - 0016
apply hlaw_right - 0017
exact hthree - 0018
exact hresidue