Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall b c. (((forall ppf_index_empty_gcdcommon ppf_entry_empty_gcdcommon. (exists pvs_gap_empty_gcdcommonbound. pvs_gap_empty_gcdcommonbound + S (ppf_index_empty_gcdcommon) = (0)) -> (((exists ff_h_pvs_empty_gcdcommonentry. ff_h_pvs_empty_gcdcommonentry + S (ppf_entry_empty_gcdcommon) = S ((S (ppf_index_empty_gcdcommon)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_empty_gcdcommonentry. b = ff_q_pvs_empty_gcdcommonentry * S ((S (ppf_index_empty_gcdcommon)) * c) + (ppf_entry_empty_gcdcommon))) -> (exists pvs_factor_empty_gcdcommondivisor. (ppf_entry_empty_gcdcommon) = (0) * pvs_factor_empty_gcdcommondivisor)) /\ (forall ppf_common_empty_gcd. (forall ppf_index_empty_gcdother ppf_entry_empty_gcdother. (exists pvs_gap_empty_gcdotherbound. pvs_gap_empty_gcdotherbound + S (ppf_index_empty_gcdother) = (0)) -> (((exists ff_h_pvs_empty_gcdotherentry. ff_h_pvs_empty_gcdotherentry + S (ppf_entry_empty_gcdother) = S ((S (ppf_index_empty_gcdother)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_empty_gcdotherentry. b = ff_q_pvs_empty_gcdotherentry * S ((S (ppf_index_empty_gcdother)) * c) + (ppf_entry_empty_gcdother))) -> (exists pvs_factor_empty_gcdotherdivisor. (ppf_entry_empty_gcdother) = (ppf_common_empty_gcd) * pvs_factor_empty_gcdotherdivisor)) -> (exists pvs_factor_empty_gcdgreatest. (0) = (ppf_common_empty_gcd) * pvs_factor_empty_gcdgreatest))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
The empty exponent prefix has greatest common divisor zero, including all common divisors of the empty family.
The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 16 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v29 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
factor_permutation_below_zero_impossible Alpha theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Separate the logical casesL3–3
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L3
split
03Fix variables and assumptionsL4–7
04Separate the logical casesL8–8
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L8
exfalso
05Use earlier factsL9–11
06Fix variables and assumptionsL12–13
07Construct an explicit witnessL14–14
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L14
exists 0
08Calculate and transport equalitiesL15–15
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L15
symm
09Use earlier factsL16–16
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L16
apply PA5