Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall a b. (forall sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_source. (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_sourceleft. (a) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_source) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_sourceleft) -> (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_sourceright. (b) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_source) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_sourceright) -> sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_source = 1) -> (forall sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_result. (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_resultleft. (a * a) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_result) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_resultleft) -> (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_resultright. (b * b) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_result) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_resultright) -> sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_result = 1)Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
The squares of two coprime naturals are genuinely coprime.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 16 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v29 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
coprime_mul_left Stable theorem; checked-use authorized coprime_mul_right Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Establish hleftL4–13
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply coprime mul left.
- L4
have hleft : forall sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left. (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftleft. (a * a) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftleft) -> (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftright. (b) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftright) -> sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left = 1 - L5
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - L6
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - L7
specialize coprime_mul_left (b) - L8
apply coprime_mul_left - L9
exact hcop - L10
exact hcop - L11
specialize coprime_mul_right (a * a) - L12
specialize coprime_mul_right (b) - L13
specialize coprime_mul_right (b)
Original exact command ledger · 16 lines
- 0001
intro a - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro hcop - 0004
have hleft : forall sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left. (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftleft. (a * a) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftleft) -> (exists pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftright. (b) = (sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left) * pvs_factor_square_coprime_leftright) -> sfd_common_divisor_square_coprime_left = 1 - 0005
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - 0006
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - 0007
specialize coprime_mul_left (b) - 0008
apply coprime_mul_left - 0009
exact hcop - 0010
exact hcop - 0011
specialize coprime_mul_right (a * a) - 0012
specialize coprime_mul_right (b) - 0013
specialize coprime_mul_right (b) - 0014
apply coprime_mul_right - 0015
exact hleft - 0016
exact hleft