Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall n p. (((~((n) = 0)) /\ (forall sfd_prime_exclusion_squarefree. (~((sfd_prime_exclusion_squarefree) = 1) /\ forall pvs_left_exclusion_squarefreedomain pvs_right_exclusion_squarefreedomain. (sfd_prime_exclusion_squarefree) = pvs_left_exclusion_squarefreedomain * pvs_right_exclusion_squarefreedomain -> pvs_left_exclusion_squarefreedomain = 1 \/ pvs_right_exclusion_squarefreedomain = 1) -> (exists pvs_le_gap_exclusion_squarefreebound. pvs_le_gap_exclusion_squarefreebound + (sfd_prime_exclusion_squarefree) = (n)) -> ~(exists pvs_factor_exclusion_squarefreesquare. (n) = (sfd_prime_exclusion_squarefree * sfd_prime_exclusion_squarefree) * pvs_factor_exclusion_squarefreesquare)))) -> (~((p) = 1) /\ forall pvs_left_exclusion_prime pvs_right_exclusion_prime. (p) = pvs_left_exclusion_prime * pvs_right_exclusion_prime -> pvs_left_exclusion_prime = 1 \/ pvs_right_exclusion_prime = 1) -> (exists pvs_factor_exclusion_divisor. (n) = (p * p) * pvs_factor_exclusion_divisor) -> falseConstructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
A squared prime divisor cannot evade the bounded squarefree definition: its base prime is itself a divisor and is at most the positive input.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 21 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v29 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
divisor_le_nonzero Stable theorem; checked-use authorized multiple_trans Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Separate the logical casesL6–6
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L6
cases hsf
03Use earlier factsL7–16
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
04Use earlier factsL17–18
05Construct an explicit witnessL19–19
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L19
exists p
06Calculate and transport equalitiesL20–20
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L20
refl
07Use earlier factsL21–21
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L21
exact hdiv
Original exact command ledger · 21 lines
- 0001
intro n - 0002
intro p - 0003
intro hsf - 0004
intro hp - 0005
intro hdiv - 0006
cases hsf - 0007
specialize hsf_right (p) - 0008
apply hsf_right - 0009
exact hp - 0010
specialize divisor_le_nonzero (p) - 0011
specialize divisor_le_nonzero (n) - 0012
apply divisor_le_nonzero - 0013
exact hsf_left - 0014
specialize multiple_trans (p * p) - 0015
specialize multiple_trans (p) - 0016
specialize multiple_trans (n) - 0017
apply multiple_trans - 0018
exact hdiv - 0019
exists p - 0020
refl - 0021
exact hdiv