Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall N F. (exists dst_positive_code_extract_table dst_positive_scale_extract_table dst_negative_code_extract_table dst_negative_scale_extract_table. (((F) = (((((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_positive_scale_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table))) + (((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)))) * S ((((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_positive_scale_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table))) + (((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)))) + ((((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table))) + (((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)))))) /\ (forall dst_index_extract_table. (exists pvs_le_gap_extract_tabledomain. pvs_le_gap_extract_tabledomain + (dst_index_extract_table) = (N)) -> exists dst_positive_extract_table dst_negative_extract_table dst_value_extract_table. ((((exists ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive. ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive + S (dst_positive_extract_table) = S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive. dst_positive_code_extract_table = ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive * S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_positive_scale_extract_table) + (dst_positive_extract_table))) /\ (((((exists ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative. ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative + S (dst_negative_extract_table) = S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative. dst_negative_code_extract_table = ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative * S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_extract_table))) /\ (exists ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue. (((((dst_value_extract_table) = 2 * (ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue) /\ (ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue) = 0) \/ exists ge_signed_half_extract_tableentryvaluedecode. (((dst_value_extract_table) = 2 * ge_signed_half_extract_tableentryvaluedecode + 1 /\ (ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue) = 0) /\ (ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue) = S ge_signed_half_extract_tableentryvaluedecode))) /\ ((dst_positive_extract_table) + ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue = (dst_negative_extract_table) + ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue))))))))) -> exists pb pc nb nc. ((F) = (((((pb) + (pc)) * S ((pb) + (pc)) + ((pc) + (pc))) + (((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc)))) * S ((((pb) + (pc)) * S ((pb) + (pc)) + ((pc) + (pc))) + (((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc)))) + ((((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc))) + (((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
A valid finite signed table always supplies its actual nested natural-pair packing.
The unchanged tactic script uses 0 declared prerequisites and contains 13 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v31 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Separate the logical casesL4–8
03Construct an explicit witnessL9–12
04Use earlier factsL13–13
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L13
exact h_witness_witness_witness_witness_left