Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded PA statement
forall p a x. ~(exists qr_x_euler_scaled_inverse. exists qr_u_euler_scaled_inverse qr_v_euler_scaled_inverse. qr_x_euler_scaled_inverse * qr_x_euler_scaled_inverse + p * qr_u_euler_scaled_inverse = a + p * qr_v_euler_scaled_inverse) -> ~((((~(x = 0) /\ (exists esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_relation_left_bound. esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_relation_left_bound + S x = p))) /\ (((~(x = 0) /\ (exists esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_relation_right_bound. esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_relation_right_bound + S x = p))) /\ (exists esi_mod_left_no_fixed_relation_mod esi_mod_right_no_fixed_relation_mod. (x * x) + p * esi_mod_left_no_fixed_relation_mod = (a) + p * esi_mod_right_no_fixed_relation_mod))))Structural proof guide
Generated structural guide
A negative QRes witness makes the scaled involution fixed-point-free.
Use the direct prerequisites scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by case analysis (2), intermediate claims (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Alpha-v25 checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed; it is not a Stable theorem.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Establish hfixedL6–9
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption.
- L6
have hfixed : (((~(x = 0) /\ (exists esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_square_unit_bound. esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_square_unit_bound + S x = p))) /\ (exists esi_mod_left_no_fixed_square_square esi_mod_right_no_fixed_square_square. (x * x) + p * esi_mod_left_no_fixed_square_square = (a) + p * esi_mod_right_no_fixed_square_square)) - L7
specialize scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff p - L8
specialize scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff a - L9
specialize scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff x
03Separate the logical casesL10–10
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L10
cases scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff
04Use earlier factsL11–12
05Separate the logical casesL13–13
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L13
cases hfixed
06Use earlier factsL14–14
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L14
apply hnq
07Construct an explicit witnessL15–15
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L15
exists x
08Use earlier factsL16–16
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L16
exact hfixed_right
Original exact command ledger · 16 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro a - 0003
intro x - 0004
intro hnq - 0005
intro hrel - 0006
have hfixed : (((~(x = 0) /\ (exists esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_square_unit_bound. esi_strict_gap_no_fixed_square_unit_bound + S x = p))) /\ (exists esi_mod_left_no_fixed_square_square esi_mod_right_no_fixed_square_square. (x * x) + p * esi_mod_left_no_fixed_square_square = (a) + p * esi_mod_right_no_fixed_square_square)) - 0007
specialize scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff p - 0008
specialize scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff a - 0009
specialize scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff x - 0010
cases scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff - 0011
apply scaled_inverse_fixed_point_iff_left - 0012
exact hrel - 0013
cases hfixed - 0014
apply hnq - 0015
exists x - 0016
exact hfixed_right