Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded PA statement
forall b c a l i x. (forall ff_i_entry. (exists ff_lt_entry_bound. ff_lt_entry_bound + S ff_i_entry = l) -> (((exists ff_h_entry_decoded. ff_h_entry_decoded + S (a + ff_i_entry) = S ((S (ff_i_entry)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_entry_decoded. b = ff_q_entry_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_entry)) * c) + (a + ff_i_entry)))) -> (exists h. h + S i = l) -> (((exists ff_h_range_entry_x. ff_h_range_entry_x + S (x) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_range_entry_x. b = ff_q_range_entry_x * S ((S (i)) * c) + (x))) -> x = a + iStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
A decoded entry of a Range prefix is its start plus its index.
Use the direct prerequisites beta_at_unique as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by intermediate claims (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
PA0034 beta_half_range_entry_bounds PA003T beta_range_injective PA0065 factorial_succ_decompose PA006A beta_range_transport_entry PA007C gauss_signed_half_magnitude_injective PA007V gauss_predecessor_half_range_aligned PA008F beta_range_one_entry_eq_succ PA00A1 scaled_pair_order_successor_lift_product_is_factorial PA00BC pair_order_predecessor_range_two_successor_lift_aligned PA00BG beta_range_two_product_is_factorial_succFormal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–9
02Establish haL10–19
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply hrange.
- L10
have ha : ((exists h. h + S (a + i) = S ((S i) * c)) /\ exists q. b = q * S ((S i) * c) + (a + i)) - L11
specialize hrange i - L12
apply hrange - L13
exact hi - L14
specialize beta_at_unique b - L15
specialize beta_at_unique c - L16
specialize beta_at_unique i - L17
specialize beta_at_unique x - L18
specialize beta_at_unique (a + i) - L19
apply beta_at_unique
Original exact command ledger · 21 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro a - 0004
intro l - 0005
intro i - 0006
intro x - 0007
intro hrange - 0008
intro hi - 0009
intro hx - 0010
have ha : ((exists h. h + S (a + i) = S ((S i) * c)) /\ exists q. b = q * S ((S i) * c) + (a + i)) - 0011
specialize hrange i - 0012
apply hrange - 0013
exact hi - 0014
specialize beta_at_unique b - 0015
specialize beta_at_unique c - 0016
specialize beta_at_unique i - 0017
specialize beta_at_unique x - 0018
specialize beta_at_unique (a + i) - 0019
apply beta_at_unique - 0020
exact hx - 0021
exact ha