Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded PA statement
forall C B. ~(C = 0) -> exists h. h + B = C * BStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
Scaling by a nonzero natural does not decrease a natural.
Use the direct prerequisites one_le_of_ne_zero, mul_le_mul_right, one_mul as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by intermediate claims (2), equality transport (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (3)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Establish h1CL4–7
03Establish hscaledL8–16
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mul le mul right.
Original exact command ledger · 16 lines
- 0001
intro C - 0002
intro B - 0003
intro hC - 0004
have h1C : exists h. h + 1 = C - 0005
specialize one_le_of_ne_zero C - 0006
apply one_le_of_ne_zero - 0007
exact hC - 0008
have hscaled : exists h. h + 1 * B = C * B - 0009
specialize mul_le_mul_right 1 - 0010
specialize mul_le_mul_right C - 0011
specialize mul_le_mul_right B - 0012
apply mul_le_mul_right - 0013
exact h1C - 0014
specialize one_mul B - 0015
rewrite one_mul at hscaled - 0016
exact hscaled