Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded PA statement
forall N C B. (forall t. (exists h. S t + S h = S N) -> exists q. C = S t * q) -> forall t. (exists h. S t + S h = S N) -> exists q. C * B = S t * qStructural proof guide
Generated structural guide
A right multiple of a bounded common multiple remains such a common multiple.
Use the direct prerequisites multiple_mul_right as previously established PA formulas.
The proof proceeds by intermediate claims (1).
Referenced ingredients
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Linked names are exact direct references. This Stable checked-use theorem is independently kernel-checked when replayed.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Establish htCL7–15
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply hcm.
Original exact command ledger · 15 lines
- 0001
intro N - 0002
intro C - 0003
intro B - 0004
intro hcm - 0005
intro t - 0006
intro ht - 0007
have htC : exists q. C = S t * q - 0008
specialize hcm t - 0009
apply hcm - 0010
exact ht - 0011
specialize multiple_mul_right (S t) - 0012
specialize multiple_mul_right C - 0013
specialize multiple_mul_right B - 0014
apply multiple_mul_right - 0015
exact htC