Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ p. ∀ a. ∀ x. ∀ y. ∀ z. ModEq(p,x · y,a) → ModEq(p,y,z) → ModEq(p,x · z,a)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This is a reading surface; the compiler expands the statement before the unchanged kernel checks it.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
3 occurrences
In local proof propositions
2 occurrences
Exact expanded native-PA statement
forall p a x y z. (exists esi_mod_left_transport_source esi_mod_right_transport_source. (x * y) + p * esi_mod_left_transport_source = (a) + p * esi_mod_right_transport_source) -> (exists esi_mod_left_transport_argument esi_mod_right_transport_argument. (y) + p * esi_mod_left_transport_argument = (z) + p * esi_mod_right_transport_argument) -> (exists esi_mod_left_transport_result esi_mod_right_transport_result. (x * z) + p * esi_mod_left_transport_result = (a) + p * esi_mod_right_transport_result)Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only local propositions introduced by have or suffices are compacted. The untrusted compiler re-expands each one before the original tactic script is replayed; defined notation is never accepted by the kernel. Open the exact replay line beneath every changed command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (3)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–7
02Establish hscaledL8–14
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mod eq mul left.
- L8
have hscaled : ModEq(p,x · y,x · z)Definitions: ModEq(p,x · y,x · z)Original native command in the exact edition - L9
specialize mod_eq_mul_left p - L10
specialize mod_eq_mul_left y - L11
specialize mod_eq_mul_left z - L12
specialize mod_eq_mul_left x - L13
apply mod_eq_mul_left - L14
exact hyz
03Establish hreverseL15–24
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mod eq symm.
- L15
have hreverse : ModEq(p,x · z,x · y)Definitions: ModEq(p,x · z,x · y)Original native command in the exact edition - L16
specialize mod_eq_symm p - L17
specialize mod_eq_symm (x * y) - L18
specialize mod_eq_symm (x * z) - L19
apply mod_eq_symm - L20
exact hscaled - L21
specialize mod_eq_trans p - L22
specialize mod_eq_trans (x * z) - L23
specialize mod_eq_trans (x * y) - L24
specialize mod_eq_trans a
Original defined command ledger · 27 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro a - 0003
intro x - 0004
intro y - 0005
intro z - 0006
intro hxy - 0007
intro hyz - 0008
have hscaled : ModEq(p,x · y,x · z)Exact native replay line
have hscaled : exists esi_mod_left_transport_scaled esi_mod_right_transport_scaled. (x * y) + p * esi_mod_left_transport_scaled = (x * z) + p * esi_mod_right_transport_scaled - 0009
specialize mod_eq_mul_left p - 0010
specialize mod_eq_mul_left y - 0011
specialize mod_eq_mul_left z - 0012
specialize mod_eq_mul_left x - 0013
apply mod_eq_mul_left - 0014
exact hyz - 0015
have hreverse : ModEq(p,x · z,x · y)Exact native replay line
have hreverse : exists esi_mod_left_transport_reverse esi_mod_right_transport_reverse. (x * z) + p * esi_mod_left_transport_reverse = (x * y) + p * esi_mod_right_transport_reverse - 0016
specialize mod_eq_symm p - 0017
specialize mod_eq_symm (x * y) - 0018
specialize mod_eq_symm (x * z) - 0019
apply mod_eq_symm - 0020
exact hscaled - 0021
specialize mod_eq_trans p - 0022
specialize mod_eq_trans (x * z) - 0023
specialize mod_eq_trans (x * y) - 0024
specialize mod_eq_trans a - 0025
apply mod_eq_trans - 0026
exact hreverse - 0027
exact hxy