Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ sb. ∀ sc. ∀ fb. ∀ fc. ∀ r. ∀ l. (∀ x. ∀ y. Lt(x,S l) → BetaAt(sb,sc,x,y) → y = 0 ∧ BetaAt(fb,fc,x,1) ∨ y = 1 ∧ BetaAt(fb,fc,x,r)) → ∀ x. ∀ y. Lt(x,l) → BetaAt(sb,sc,x,y) → y = 0 ∧ BetaAt(fb,fc,x,1) ∨ y = 1 ∧ BetaAt(fb,fc,x,r)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This is a reading surface; the compiler expands the statement before the unchanged kernel checks it.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
8 occurrences
In local proof propositions
0 occurrences
Exact expanded native-PA statement
forall sb sc fb fc r l. (forall gspf_index_drop_successor gspf_bit_drop_successor. (exists gsp_lt_gap_drop_successor_bound. gsp_lt_gap_drop_successor_bound + S gspf_index_drop_successor = S l) -> (((exists ff_h_gspf_drop_successor_bit. ff_h_gspf_drop_successor_bit + S (gspf_bit_drop_successor) = S ((S (gspf_index_drop_successor)) * sc)) /\ exists ff_q_gspf_drop_successor_bit. sb = ff_q_gspf_drop_successor_bit * S ((S (gspf_index_drop_successor)) * sc) + (gspf_bit_drop_successor))) -> (((gspf_bit_drop_successor = 0) /\ (((exists gsp_beta_height_gspf_drop_successor_one. gsp_beta_height_gspf_drop_successor_one + S (1) = S ((S (gspf_index_drop_successor)) * fc)) /\ exists gsp_beta_quotient_gspf_drop_successor_one. fb = gsp_beta_quotient_gspf_drop_successor_one * S ((S (gspf_index_drop_successor)) * fc) + (1)))) \/ ((gspf_bit_drop_successor = 1) /\ (((exists ff_h_gspf_drop_successor_predecessor. ff_h_gspf_drop_successor_predecessor + S (r) = S ((S (gspf_index_drop_successor)) * fc)) /\ exists ff_q_gspf_drop_successor_predecessor. fb = ff_q_gspf_drop_successor_predecessor * S ((S (gspf_index_drop_successor)) * fc) + (r)))))) -> (forall gspf_index_drop_prefix gspf_bit_drop_prefix. (exists gsp_lt_gap_drop_prefix_bound. gsp_lt_gap_drop_prefix_bound + S gspf_index_drop_prefix = l) -> (((exists ff_h_gspf_drop_prefix_bit. ff_h_gspf_drop_prefix_bit + S (gspf_bit_drop_prefix) = S ((S (gspf_index_drop_prefix)) * sc)) /\ exists ff_q_gspf_drop_prefix_bit. sb = ff_q_gspf_drop_prefix_bit * S ((S (gspf_index_drop_prefix)) * sc) + (gspf_bit_drop_prefix))) -> (((gspf_bit_drop_prefix = 0) /\ (((exists gsp_beta_height_gspf_drop_prefix_one. gsp_beta_height_gspf_drop_prefix_one + S (1) = S ((S (gspf_index_drop_prefix)) * fc)) /\ exists gsp_beta_quotient_gspf_drop_prefix_one. fb = gsp_beta_quotient_gspf_drop_prefix_one * S ((S (gspf_index_drop_prefix)) * fc) + (1)))) \/ ((gspf_bit_drop_prefix = 1) /\ (((exists ff_h_gspf_drop_prefix_predecessor. ff_h_gspf_drop_prefix_predecessor + S (r) = S ((S (gspf_index_drop_prefix)) * fc)) /\ exists ff_q_gspf_drop_prefix_predecessor. fb = ff_q_gspf_drop_prefix_predecessor * S ((S (gspf_index_drop_prefix)) * fc) + (r))))))Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only local propositions introduced by have or suffices are compacted. The untrusted compiler re-expands each one before the original tactic script is replayed; defined notation is never accepted by the kernel. Open the exact replay line beneath every changed command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Fix variables and assumptionsL11–11
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L11
intro ha