Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ a. ∀ e. ∀ n. e = 2 → Pow(a,e,n) → n = a · aEvery purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This is a reading surface; the compiler expands the statement before the unchanged kernel checks it.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
1 occurrences
In local proof propositions
0 occurrences
Exact expanded native-PA statement
forall a e n. e = 2 -> (exists ff_b_two ff_c_two. ((forall ff_i_two_repeat. (exists ff_lt_two_repeat_bound. ff_lt_two_repeat_bound + S ff_i_two_repeat = e) -> (((exists ff_h_two_repeat_decoded. ff_h_two_repeat_decoded + S (a) = S ((S (ff_i_two_repeat)) * ff_c_two)) /\ exists ff_q_two_repeat_decoded. ff_b_two = ff_q_two_repeat_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_two_repeat)) * ff_c_two) + (a)))) /\ (exists ff_u_two_product ff_v_two_product. ((((exists ff_h_two_product_start. ff_h_two_product_start + S (1) = S ((S (0)) * ff_v_two_product)) /\ exists ff_q_two_product_start. ff_u_two_product = ff_q_two_product_start * S ((S (0)) * ff_v_two_product) + (1))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_two_product_terminal. ff_h_two_product_terminal + S (n) = S ((S (e)) * ff_v_two_product)) /\ exists ff_q_two_product_terminal. ff_u_two_product = ff_q_two_product_terminal * S ((S (e)) * ff_v_two_product) + (n))) /\ forall ff_i_two_product. (exists ff_lt_two_product_bound. ff_lt_two_product_bound + S ff_i_two_product = e) -> exists ff_p_two_product ff_r_two_product ff_s_two_product. ((((exists ff_h_two_product_factor. ff_h_two_product_factor + S (ff_p_two_product) = S ((S (ff_i_two_product)) * ff_c_two)) /\ exists ff_q_two_product_factor. ff_b_two = ff_q_two_product_factor * S ((S (ff_i_two_product)) * ff_c_two) + (ff_p_two_product))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_two_product_partial. ff_h_two_product_partial + S (ff_r_two_product) = S ((S (ff_i_two_product)) * ff_v_two_product)) /\ exists ff_q_two_product_partial. ff_u_two_product = ff_q_two_product_partial * S ((S (ff_i_two_product)) * ff_v_two_product) + (ff_r_two_product))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_two_product_successor. ff_h_two_product_successor + S (ff_s_two_product) = S ((S (S ff_i_two_product)) * ff_v_two_product)) /\ exists ff_q_two_product_successor. ff_u_two_product = ff_q_two_product_successor * S ((S (S ff_i_two_product)) * ff_v_two_product) + (ff_s_two_product))) /\ ff_s_two_product = ff_r_two_product * ff_p_two_product)))))))) -> n = a * aProof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only local propositions introduced by have or suffices are compacted. The untrusted compiler re-expands each one before the original tactic script is replayed; defined notation is never accepted by the kernel. Open the exact replay line beneath every changed command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Use earlier factsL6–10
03Calculate and transport equalitiesL11–11
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L11
refl
Original defined command ledger · 13 lines
- 0001
intro a - 0002
intro e - 0003
intro n - 0004
intro he - 0005
intro hpow - 0006
specialize pow_two_from_one_successor a - 0007
specialize pow_two_from_one_successor 1 - 0008
specialize pow_two_from_one_successor e - 0009
specialize pow_two_from_one_successor n - 0010
apply pow_two_from_one_successor - 0011
refl - 0012
exact he - 0013
exact hpow