PA0049 · theorem

beta_product_zero

Stable checked-use theorem · independently closed

The product of an empty decoded prefix is one.

Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.

Statement with defined notation

∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ n. Product(b,c,0,n) → n = 1

Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This is a reading surface; the compiler expands the statement before the unchanged kernel checks it.

Definitions used by this theorem

In the theorem statement

1 occurrences

In local proof propositions

none

0 occurrences

Exact expanded native-PA statement
forall b c n. (exists u v. (((exists h. h + S 1 = S ((S 0) * v)) /\ exists q. u = q * S ((S 0) * v) + 1) /\ (((exists h. h + S n = S ((S 0) * v)) /\ exists q. u = q * S ((S 0) * v) + n) /\ forall i. (exists h. h + S i = 0) -> exists p r s. (((exists h. h + S p = S ((S i) * c)) /\ exists q. b = q * S ((S i) * c) + p) /\ (((exists h. h + S r = S ((S i) * v)) /\ exists q. u = q * S ((S i) * v) + r) /\ (((exists h. h + S s = S ((S S i) * v)) /\ exists q. u = q * S ((S S i) * v) + s) /\ s = r * p)))))) -> n = 1

Proof neighborhood

Direct theorem prerequisites

Direct theorem dependents

Definition-aware tactic body

Only local propositions introduced by have or suffices are compacted. The untrusted compiler re-expands each one before the original tactic script is replayed; defined notation is never accepted by the kernel. Open the exact replay line beneath every changed command.

Read the argument

Proof checkpoints

16 script commands · 3 reading checkpoints · 0 local claims

This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.

Definition notation is shown below. Open the paired exact edition for the original native formulas. Source pairing is not a new equivalence certificate.

Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–4

Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.

  1. L1
    intro b
  2. L2
    intro c
  3. L3
    intro n
  4. L4
    intro hproduct
02Separate the logical casesL5–8

Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.

  1. L5
    cases hproduct
  2. L6
    cases hproduct_witness
  3. L7
    cases hproduct_witness_witness
  4. L8
    cases hproduct_witness_witness_right
03Use earlier factsL9–16

Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.

  1. L9
    specialize beta_at_unique x
  2. L10
    specialize beta_at_unique x1
  3. L11
    specialize beta_at_unique 0
  4. L12
    specialize beta_at_unique n
  5. L13
    specialize beta_at_unique 1
  6. L14
    apply beta_at_unique
  7. L15
    exact hproduct_witness_witness_right_left
  8. L16
    exact hproduct_witness_witness_left

Library-wide reading audit

Original defined command ledger · 16 lines
  1. 0001intro b
  2. 0002intro c
  3. 0003intro n
  4. 0004intro hproduct
  5. 0005cases hproduct
  6. 0006cases hproduct_witness
  7. 0007cases hproduct_witness_witness
  8. 0008cases hproduct_witness_witness_right
  9. 0009specialize beta_at_unique x
  10. 0010specialize beta_at_unique x1
  11. 0011specialize beta_at_unique 0
  12. 0012specialize beta_at_unique n
  13. 0013specialize beta_at_unique 1
  14. 0014apply beta_at_unique
  15. 0015exact hproduct_witness_witness_right_left
  16. 0016exact hproduct_witness_witness_left