Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ a. ∀ e. ∃ n. Pow(a,e,n)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This is a reading surface; the compiler expands the statement before the unchanged kernel checks it.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
1 occurrences
In local proof propositions
1 occurrences
Exact expanded native-PA statement
forall a e. exists n. (exists ff_b_x ff_c_x. ((forall ff_i_x_repeat. (exists ff_lt_x_repeat_bound. ff_lt_x_repeat_bound + S ff_i_x_repeat = e) -> (((exists ff_h_x_repeat_decoded. ff_h_x_repeat_decoded + S (a) = S ((S (ff_i_x_repeat)) * ff_c_x)) /\ exists ff_q_x_repeat_decoded. ff_b_x = ff_q_x_repeat_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_x_repeat)) * ff_c_x) + (a)))) /\ (exists ff_u_x_product ff_v_x_product. ((((exists ff_h_x_product_start. ff_h_x_product_start + S (1) = S ((S (0)) * ff_v_x_product)) /\ exists ff_q_x_product_start. ff_u_x_product = ff_q_x_product_start * S ((S (0)) * ff_v_x_product) + (1))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_x_product_terminal. ff_h_x_product_terminal + S (n) = S ((S (e)) * ff_v_x_product)) /\ exists ff_q_x_product_terminal. ff_u_x_product = ff_q_x_product_terminal * S ((S (e)) * ff_v_x_product) + (n))) /\ forall ff_i_x_product. (exists ff_lt_x_product_bound. ff_lt_x_product_bound + S ff_i_x_product = e) -> exists ff_p_x_product ff_r_x_product ff_s_x_product. ((((exists ff_h_x_product_factor. ff_h_x_product_factor + S (ff_p_x_product) = S ((S (ff_i_x_product)) * ff_c_x)) /\ exists ff_q_x_product_factor. ff_b_x = ff_q_x_product_factor * S ((S (ff_i_x_product)) * ff_c_x) + (ff_p_x_product))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_x_product_partial. ff_h_x_product_partial + S (ff_r_x_product) = S ((S (ff_i_x_product)) * ff_v_x_product)) /\ exists ff_q_x_product_partial. ff_u_x_product = ff_q_x_product_partial * S ((S (ff_i_x_product)) * ff_v_x_product) + (ff_r_x_product))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_x_product_successor. ff_h_x_product_successor + S (ff_s_x_product) = S ((S (S ff_i_x_product)) * ff_v_x_product)) /\ exists ff_q_x_product_successor. ff_u_x_product = ff_q_x_product_successor * S ((S (S ff_i_x_product)) * ff_v_x_product) + (ff_s_x_product))) /\ ff_s_x_product = ff_r_x_product * ff_p_x_product))))))))Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only local propositions introduced by have or suffices are compacted. The untrusted compiler re-expands each one before the original tactic script is replayed; defined notation is never accepted by the kernel. Open the exact replay line beneath every changed command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Establish hrepeatL3–6
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption.
- L3
have hrepeat : ∃ b. ∃ c. Repeat(b,c,a,e)Definitions: Repeat(b,c,a,e)Original native command in the exact edition - L4
specialize beta_repeat_exists a - L5
specialize beta_repeat_exists e - L6
exact beta_repeat_exists
03Separate the logical casesL7–8
04Use earlier factsL9–11
05Separate the logical casesL12–14
06Construct an explicit witnessL15–17
07Separate the logical casesL18–18
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L18
split
08Use earlier factsL19–19
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L19
exact hrepeat_witness_witness
09Construct an explicit witnessL20–21
10Use earlier factsL22–22
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L22
exact beta_product_exists_witness_witness_witness
Original defined command ledger · 22 lines
- 0001
intro a - 0002
intro e - 0003
have hrepeat : ∃ b. ∃ c. Repeat(b,c,a,e)Exact native replay line
have hrepeat : exists b c. (forall i. (exists h. h + S i = e) -> ((exists h. h + S a = S ((S i) * c)) /\ exists q. b = q * S ((S i) * c) + a)) - 0004
specialize beta_repeat_exists a - 0005
specialize beta_repeat_exists e - 0006
exact beta_repeat_exists - 0007
cases hrepeat - 0008
cases hrepeat_witness - 0009
specialize beta_product_exists x - 0010
specialize beta_product_exists x1 - 0011
specialize beta_product_exists e - 0012
cases beta_product_exists - 0013
cases beta_product_exists_witness - 0014
cases beta_product_exists_witness_witness - 0015
exists x2 - 0016
exists x - 0017
exists x1 - 0018
split - 0019
exact hrepeat_witness_witness - 0020
exists x3 - 0021
exists x4 - 0022
exact beta_product_exists_witness_witness_witness