Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall a b. (forall pff_divisor_ffd_square_source. (exists pff_left_ffd_square_source. (a) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_source * pff_left_ffd_square_source) -> (exists pff_right_ffd_square_source. (b) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_source * pff_right_ffd_square_source) -> pff_divisor_ffd_square_source = 1) -> (forall pff_divisor_ffd_square_result. (exists pff_left_ffd_square_result. (a * a) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_result * pff_left_ffd_square_result) -> (exists pff_right_ffd_square_result. (b * b) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_result * pff_right_ffd_square_result) -> pff_divisor_ffd_square_result = 1)Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Coprime natural bases have coprime squares, with no prime-factorization assumption.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 16 exact native proof lines.
dependency-curried kernel-checked theorem body; Alpha enrollment and checked-use authority follow separately sealed release evidence; Stable membership remains unchanged
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
coprime_mul_left Stable theorem; checked-use authorized coprime_mul_right Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Establish hrightL4–13
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply coprime mul right.
- L4
have hright : forall pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle. (exists pff_left_ffd_square_middle. (a) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle * pff_left_ffd_square_middle) -> (exists pff_right_ffd_square_middle. (b * b) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle * pff_right_ffd_square_middle) -> pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle = 1 - L5
specialize coprime_mul_right (a) - L6
specialize coprime_mul_right (b) - L7
specialize coprime_mul_right (b) - L8
apply coprime_mul_right - L9
exact hcoprime - L10
exact hcoprime - L11
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - L12
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - L13
specialize coprime_mul_left (b * b)
Original exact command ledger · 16 lines
- 0001
intro a - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro hcoprime - 0004
have hright : forall pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle. (exists pff_left_ffd_square_middle. (a) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle * pff_left_ffd_square_middle) -> (exists pff_right_ffd_square_middle. (b * b) = pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle * pff_right_ffd_square_middle) -> pff_divisor_ffd_square_middle = 1 - 0005
specialize coprime_mul_right (a) - 0006
specialize coprime_mul_right (b) - 0007
specialize coprime_mul_right (b) - 0008
apply coprime_mul_right - 0009
exact hcoprime - 0010
exact hcoprime - 0011
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - 0012
specialize coprime_mul_left (a) - 0013
specialize coprime_mul_left (b * b) - 0014
apply coprime_mul_left - 0015
exact hright - 0016
exact hright