Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall B. exists p. (((~(p = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_ptmf_prime frm_prime_right_ptmf_prime. p = frm_prime_left_ptmf_prime * frm_prime_right_ptmf_prime -> frm_prime_left_ptmf_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_ptmf_prime = 1)) /\ ((exists gap. gap + S B = p) /\ (exists ff_residue_ptmf_prime. (p) = 4 * ff_residue_ptmf_prime + 3)))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
For every natural bound, construct an actual strictly larger prime with an explicit residue witness p=4k+3.
The unchanged tactic script uses 4 declared prerequisites and contains 27 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v23 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
bounded_common_multiple_exists Stable theorem; checked-use authorized nonzero_is_succ Stable theorem; checked-use authorized TF000F euclid_three_progression_prime_exists TF0011 euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_boundDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–1
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L1
intro B
02Use earlier factsL2–2
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L2
specialize bounded_common_multiple_exists B
03Separate the logical casesL3–4
04Establish hpredecessorL5–8
05Separate the logical casesL9–9
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L9
cases hpredecessor
06Use earlier factsL10–10
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L10
specialize euclid_three_progression_prime_exists x1
07Separate the logical casesL11–13
08Construct an explicit witnessL14–14
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L14
exists x2
09Separate the logical casesL15–15
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L15
split
10Use earlier factsL16–16
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L16
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_left
11Separate the logical casesL17–17
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L17
split
12Use earlier factsL18–27
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L18
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound B - L19
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound x - L20
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound x1 - L21
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound x2 - L22
apply euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound - L23
exact bounded_common_multiple_exists_witness_right - L24
exact hpredecessor_witness - L25
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_left - L26
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_right_right - L27
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_right_left
Original exact command ledger · 27 lines
- 0001
intro B - 0002
specialize bounded_common_multiple_exists B - 0003
cases bounded_common_multiple_exists - 0004
cases bounded_common_multiple_exists_witness - 0005
have hpredecessor : exists d. x = S d - 0006
specialize nonzero_is_succ x - 0007
apply nonzero_is_succ - 0008
exact bounded_common_multiple_exists_witness_left - 0009
cases hpredecessor - 0010
specialize euclid_three_progression_prime_exists x1 - 0011
cases euclid_three_progression_prime_exists - 0012
cases euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness - 0013
cases euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_right - 0014
exists x2 - 0015
split - 0016
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_left - 0017
split - 0018
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound B - 0019
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound x - 0020
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound x1 - 0021
specialize euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound x2 - 0022
apply euclid_three_prime_divisor_exceeds_bound - 0023
exact bounded_common_multiple_exists_witness_right - 0024
exact hpredecessor_witness - 0025
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_left - 0026
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_right_right - 0027
exact euclid_three_progression_prime_exists_witness_right_left