Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Length is representation length, not polynomial degree. Leading zeros and the empty zero polynomial are allowed; the canonical argument guard x<p also applies to the empty case. Evaluation is defined by actual field-operation steps, not an assumed residue invariant. Polynomial division, gcd, irreducibles and general prime-power extension fields remain open; this does not close G091.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ p. ∀ ab. ∀ ac. ∀ bb. ∀ bc. ∀ cb. ∀ cc. ∀ AB. ∀ AC. ∀ BB. ∀ BC. ∀ CB. ∀ CC. ∀ l. BetaPrefixEqual(ab,ac,AB,AC,l) → BetaPrefixEqual(bb,bc,BB,BC,l) → BetaPrefixEqual(cb,cc,CB,CC,l) → FpPolyAdd(p,ab,ac,bb,bc,cb,cc,l) → FpPolyAdd(p,AB,AC,BB,BC,CB,CC,l)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 52 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Fix variables and assumptionsL11–20
03Establish hvL21–24
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply h.
- L21
have hv : ∃ a. ∃ b. ∃ r. BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a) ∧ (BetaAt(bb,bc,i,b) ∧ (BetaAt(cb,cc,i,r) ∧ FpAdd(p,a,b,r)))Definitions: BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a)BetaAt(bb,bc,i,b)BetaAt(cb,cc,i,r)FpAdd(p,a,b,r)Original native command in the exact edition - L22
specialize h (i) - L23
apply h - L24
exact hi
04Separate the logical casesL25–30
05Construct an explicit witnessL31–33
06Separate the logical casesL34–34
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L34
split
07Use earlier factsL35–39
08Separate the logical casesL40–40
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L40
split
09Use earlier factsL41–45
10Separate the logical casesL46–46
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L46
split
Original defined command ledger · 52 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro ab - 0003
intro ac - 0004
intro bb - 0005
intro bc - 0006
intro cb - 0007
intro cc - 0008
intro AB - 0009
intro AC - 0010
intro BB - 0011
intro BC - 0012
intro CB - 0013
intro CC - 0014
intro l - 0015
intro ha - 0016
intro hb - 0017
intro hc - 0018
intro h - 0019
intro i - 0020
intro hi - 0021
have hv : ∃ a. ∃ b. ∃ r. BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a) ∧ (BetaAt(bb,bc,i,b) ∧ (BetaAt(cb,cc,i,r) ∧ FpAdd(p,a,b,r))) - 0022
specialize h (i) - 0023
apply h - 0024
exact hi - 0025
cases hv - 0026
cases hv_witness - 0027
cases hv_witness_witness - 0028
cases hv_witness_witness_witness - 0029
cases hv_witness_witness_witness_right - 0030
cases hv_witness_witness_witness_right_right - 0031
exists x - 0032
exists x1 - 0033
exists x2 - 0034
split - 0035
specialize ha (i) - 0036
specialize ha (x) - 0037
apply ha - 0038
exact hi - 0039
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_left - 0040
split - 0041
specialize hb (i) - 0042
specialize hb (x1) - 0043
apply hb - 0044
exact hi - 0045
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_left - 0046
split - 0047
specialize hc (i) - 0048
specialize hc (x2) - 0049
apply hc - 0050
exact hi - 0051
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_right_left - 0052
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_right_right