Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Every successor is the globally least prime above its predecessor. This is not a sparse Bertrand chain. The bound theorem constructs the list and both power witnesses from k≠0 alone; the separate total-list theorem includes k=0.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ B. ∃ p. Prime(p) ∧ Lt(B,p)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 8 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–1
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L1
intro B
02Use earlier factsL2–2
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L2
specialize prime_unbounded B
03Separate the logical casesL3–4
04Construct an explicit witnessL5–5
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L5
exists x
05Separate the logical casesL6–6
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L6
split