Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall u b c l. exists d f. forall pc_index_cut_exists. (exists pc_lt_cut_exists_bound. pc_lt_cut_exists_bound + S (pc_index_cut_exists) = (l)) -> exists pc_bit_cut_exists. (((exists fs_h_pc_cut_exists_entry. fs_h_pc_cut_exists_entry + S (pc_bit_cut_exists) = S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists)) * f)) /\ exists fs_q_pc_cut_exists_entry. d = fs_q_pc_cut_exists_entry * S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists)) * f) + (pc_bit_cut_exists))) /\ ((((exists pc_lt_cut_exists_choice_below. pc_lt_cut_exists_choice_below + S (pc_index_cut_exists) = (u)) /\ pc_bit_cut_exists = 0) \/ ((exists pc_le_cut_exists_choice_above. pc_le_cut_exists_choice_above + (u) = (pc_index_cut_exists)) /\ (((exists fs_h_pc_cut_exists_choice_source. fs_h_pc_cut_exists_choice_source + S (pc_bit_cut_exists) = S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_pc_cut_exists_choice_source. b = fs_q_pc_cut_exists_choice_source * S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists)) * c) + (pc_bit_cut_exists))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Construct the complete finite cutoff table by actual length induction.
The unchanged tactic script uses 3 declared prerequisites and contains 33 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v27 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (3)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Induction on lL4–4
Split the argument into the base and successor obligations. The induction hypothesis is available only in the successor branch.
- L4
induction l
03Construct an explicit witnessL5–6
04Use earlier factsL7–12
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
05Establish hpL13–14
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply IH.
- L13
have hp : ∃ d. ∃ f. BetaCutoffPrefix(u,b,c,d,f,l)Definitions: BetaCutoffPrefix - L14
apply IH
06Separate the logical casesL15–16
07Establish hcL17–22
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply beta cutoff choice exists.
- L17
have hc : exists e. (((exists pc_lt_cut_exists_choice_below. pc_lt_cut_exists_choice_below + S (l) = (u)) /\ e = 0) \/ ((exists pc_le_cut_exists_choice_above. pc_le_cut_exists_choice_above + (u) = (l)) /\ (((exists fs_h_pc_cut_exists_choice_source. fs_h_pc_cut_exists_choice_source + S (e) = S ((S (l)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_pc_cut_exists_choice_source. b = fs_q_pc_cut_exists_choice_source * S ((S (l)) * c) + (e))))) - L18
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists u - L19
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists b - L20
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists c - L21
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists l - L22
apply beta_cutoff_choice_exists
08Separate the logical casesL23–23
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L23
cases hc
09Use earlier factsL24–33
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L24
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend u - L25
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend b - L26
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend c - L27
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend x - L28
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend x1 - L29
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend l - L30
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend x2 - L31
apply beta_cutoff_prefix_extend - L32
exact hp_witness_witness - L33
exact hc_witness
Original exact command ledger · 33 lines
- 0001
intro u - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro c - 0004
induction l - 0005
exists 0 - 0006
exists 0 - 0007
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_empty u - 0008
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_empty b - 0009
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_empty c - 0010
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_empty 0 - 0011
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_empty 0 - 0012
apply beta_cutoff_prefix_empty - 0013
have hp : exists d f. forall pc_index_cut_exists_pre. (exists pc_lt_cut_exists_pre_bound. pc_lt_cut_exists_pre_bound + S (pc_index_cut_exists_pre) = (l)) -> exists pc_bit_cut_exists_pre. (((exists fs_h_pc_cut_exists_pre_entry. fs_h_pc_cut_exists_pre_entry + S (pc_bit_cut_exists_pre) = S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists_pre)) * f)) /\ exists fs_q_pc_cut_exists_pre_entry. d = fs_q_pc_cut_exists_pre_entry * S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists_pre)) * f) + (pc_bit_cut_exists_pre))) /\ ((((exists pc_lt_cut_exists_pre_choice_below. pc_lt_cut_exists_pre_choice_below + S (pc_index_cut_exists_pre) = (u)) /\ pc_bit_cut_exists_pre = 0) \/ ((exists pc_le_cut_exists_pre_choice_above. pc_le_cut_exists_pre_choice_above + (u) = (pc_index_cut_exists_pre)) /\ (((exists fs_h_pc_cut_exists_pre_choice_source. fs_h_pc_cut_exists_pre_choice_source + S (pc_bit_cut_exists_pre) = S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists_pre)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_pc_cut_exists_pre_choice_source. b = fs_q_pc_cut_exists_pre_choice_source * S ((S (pc_index_cut_exists_pre)) * c) + (pc_bit_cut_exists_pre)))))) - 0014
apply IH - 0015
cases hp - 0016
cases hp_witness - 0017
have hc : exists e. (((exists pc_lt_cut_exists_choice_below. pc_lt_cut_exists_choice_below + S (l) = (u)) /\ e = 0) \/ ((exists pc_le_cut_exists_choice_above. pc_le_cut_exists_choice_above + (u) = (l)) /\ (((exists fs_h_pc_cut_exists_choice_source. fs_h_pc_cut_exists_choice_source + S (e) = S ((S (l)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_pc_cut_exists_choice_source. b = fs_q_pc_cut_exists_choice_source * S ((S (l)) * c) + (e))))) - 0018
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists u - 0019
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists b - 0020
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists c - 0021
specialize beta_cutoff_choice_exists l - 0022
apply beta_cutoff_choice_exists - 0023
cases hc - 0024
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend u - 0025
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend b - 0026
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend c - 0027
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend x - 0028
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend x1 - 0029
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend l - 0030
specialize beta_cutoff_prefix_extend x2 - 0031
apply beta_cutoff_prefix_extend - 0032
exact hp_witness_witness - 0033
exact hc_witness