Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
These are the exact finite integer inequalities with constant 8, for every N≥2. The proof uses constructive binomial and primorial infrastructure; it does not assume logarithms, asymptotic estimates, the prime number theorem, or a factorization oracle.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ l. PrimeBitPrefix(b,c,l) → ∀ x. Lt(x,l) → ∃ y. BetaAt(b,c,x,y) ∧ (y = 0 ∨ y = 1)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 22 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Establish hpL7–10
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply h.
- L7
have hp : ∃ e. BetaAt(b,c,i,e) ∧ (Prime(S i) ∧ e = 1 ∨ ¬Prime(S i) ∧ e = 0)Definitions: BetaAt(b,c,i,e)Prime(S i)Original native command in the exact edition - L8
specialize h i - L9
apply h - L10
exact hi
03Separate the logical casesL11–12
04Construct an explicit witnessL13–13
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L13
exists x
05Separate the logical casesL14–14
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L14
split
06Use earlier factsL15–15
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L15
exact hp_witness_left
07Separate the logical casesL16–18
08Use earlier factsL19–19
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L19
exact hp_witness_right_left_right
09Separate the logical casesL20–21
10Use earlier factsL22–22
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L22
exact hp_witness_right_right_right
Original defined command ledger · 22 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro l - 0004
intro h - 0005
intro i - 0006
intro hi - 0007
have hp : ∃ e. BetaAt(b,c,i,e) ∧ (Prime(S i) ∧ e = 1 ∨ ¬Prime(S i) ∧ e = 0) - 0008
specialize h i - 0009
apply h - 0010
exact hi - 0011
cases hp - 0012
cases hp_witness - 0013
exists x - 0014
split - 0015
exact hp_witness_left - 0016
cases hp_witness_right - 0017
cases hp_witness_right_left - 0018
right - 0019
exact hp_witness_right_left_right - 0020
cases hp_witness_right_right - 0021
left - 0022
exact hp_witness_right_right_right