Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall m x y r s d e. (exists hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_base hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_base. x + m * hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_base = y + m * hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_base) -> (exists hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_value hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_value. r + m * hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_value = s + m * hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_value) -> (exists hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_derivative hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_derivative. d + m * hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_derivative = e + m * hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_derivative) -> (exists hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_result hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_result. (d * x + r) + m * hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_result = (e * y + s) + m * hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_result)Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
One coupled formal-derivative Horner transition preserves balanced value and derivative congruence.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 27 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v25 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
mod_eq_mul Stable theorem; checked-use authorized mod_eq_add Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Establish hproductL11–20
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mod eq mul.
- L11
have hproduct : exists hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_product hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_product. (d * x) + m * hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_product = (e * y) + m * hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_product - L12
specialize mod_eq_mul m - L13
specialize mod_eq_mul d - L14
specialize mod_eq_mul e - L15
specialize mod_eq_mul x - L16
specialize mod_eq_mul y - L17
apply mod_eq_mul - L18
exact hderivative - L19
exact hbase - L20
specialize mod_eq_add m
Original exact command ledger · 27 lines
- 0001
intro m - 0002
intro x - 0003
intro y - 0004
intro r - 0005
intro s - 0006
intro d - 0007
intro e - 0008
intro hbase - 0009
intro hvalue - 0010
intro hderivative - 0011
have hproduct : exists hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_product hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_product. (d * x) + m * hgcrt_mod_left_pth_dstep_product = (e * y) + m * hgcrt_mod_right_pth_dstep_product - 0012
specialize mod_eq_mul m - 0013
specialize mod_eq_mul d - 0014
specialize mod_eq_mul e - 0015
specialize mod_eq_mul x - 0016
specialize mod_eq_mul y - 0017
apply mod_eq_mul - 0018
exact hderivative - 0019
exact hbase - 0020
specialize mod_eq_add m - 0021
specialize mod_eq_add (d * x) - 0022
specialize mod_eq_add (e * y) - 0023
specialize mod_eq_add r - 0024
specialize mod_eq_add s - 0025
apply mod_eq_add - 0026
exact hproduct - 0027
exact hvalue
Separate complete second-wave branches: Full G095 proof · Alpha v27.