Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ t. ∀ l. ∀ n. Horner(b,c,t,S l,n) → ∃ x. ∃ y. Beta(b,c,l,x) ∧ (Horner(b,c,t,l,y) ∧ n = y · t + x)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete unchanged native tactic proof
All 52 lines are the exact independently kernel-checked original script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Separate the logical casesL7–10
03Establish hstepL11–15
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply hsum witness witness right right.
- L11
have hstep : exists a r s. ((((exists fs_h_decomp_factor. fs_h_decomp_factor + S (a) = S ((S (l)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_decomp_factor. b = fs_q_decomp_factor * S ((S (l)) * c) + (a))) /\ ((((exists fs_h_decomp_partial. fs_h_decomp_partial + S (r) = S ((S (l)) * x1)) /\ exists fs_q_decomp_partial. x = fs_q_decomp_partial * S ((S (l)) * x1) + (r))) /\ ((((exists fs_h_decomp_successor. fs_h_decomp_successor + S (s) = S ((S (S l)) * x1)) /\ exists fs_q_decomp_successor. x = fs_q_decomp_successor * S ((S (S l)) * x1) + (s))) /\ s = r * t + a))) - L12
specialize hsum_witness_witness_right_right l - L13
apply hsum_witness_witness_right_right - L14
specialize le_refl (S l) - L15
exact le_refl
04Separate the logical casesL16–21
05Establish hnL22–30
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply beta at unique.
06Construct an explicit witnessL31–32
07Separate the logical casesL33–33
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L33
split
08Use earlier factsL34–34
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L34
exact hstep_witness_witness_witness_left
09Separate the logical casesL35–35
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L35
split
10Construct an explicit witnessL36–37
11Separate the logical casesL38–38
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L38
split
12Use earlier factsL39–39
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L39
exact hsum_witness_witness_left
13Separate the logical casesL40–40
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L40
split
14Use earlier factsL41–41
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L41
exact hstep_witness_witness_witness_right_left
15Fix variables and assumptionsL42–43
16Use earlier factsL44–49
17Calculate and transport equalitiesL50–50
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L50
trans x4
Original defined command ledger · 52 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro t - 0004
intro l - 0005
intro n - 0006
intro hsum - 0007
cases hsum - 0008
cases hsum_witness - 0009
cases hsum_witness_witness - 0010
cases hsum_witness_witness_right - 0011
have hstep : exists a r s. ((((exists fs_h_decomp_factor. fs_h_decomp_factor + S (a) = S ((S (l)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_decomp_factor. b = fs_q_decomp_factor * S ((S (l)) * c) + (a))) /\ ((((exists fs_h_decomp_partial. fs_h_decomp_partial + S (r) = S ((S (l)) * x1)) /\ exists fs_q_decomp_partial. x = fs_q_decomp_partial * S ((S (l)) * x1) + (r))) /\ ((((exists fs_h_decomp_successor. fs_h_decomp_successor + S (s) = S ((S (S l)) * x1)) /\ exists fs_q_decomp_successor. x = fs_q_decomp_successor * S ((S (S l)) * x1) + (s))) /\ s = r * t + a))) - 0012
specialize hsum_witness_witness_right_right l - 0013
apply hsum_witness_witness_right_right - 0014
specialize le_refl (S l) - 0015
exact le_refl - 0016
cases hstep - 0017
cases hstep_witness - 0018
cases hstep_witness_witness - 0019
cases hstep_witness_witness_witness - 0020
cases hstep_witness_witness_witness_right - 0021
cases hstep_witness_witness_witness_right_right - 0022
have hn : n = x4 - 0023
specialize beta_at_unique x - 0024
specialize beta_at_unique x1 - 0025
specialize beta_at_unique (S l) - 0026
specialize beta_at_unique n - 0027
specialize beta_at_unique x4 - 0028
apply beta_at_unique - 0029
exact hsum_witness_witness_right_left - 0030
exact hstep_witness_witness_witness_right_right_left - 0031
exists x2 - 0032
exists x3 - 0033
split - 0034
exact hstep_witness_witness_witness_left - 0035
split - 0036
exists x - 0037
exists x1 - 0038
split - 0039
exact hsum_witness_witness_left - 0040
split - 0041
exact hstep_witness_witness_witness_right_left - 0042
intro i - 0043
intro hi - 0044
specialize hsum_witness_witness_right_right i - 0045
apply hsum_witness_witness_right_right - 0046
specialize le_succ (S i) - 0047
specialize le_succ l - 0048
apply le_succ - 0049
exact hi - 0050
trans x4 - 0051
exact hn - 0052
exact hstep_witness_witness_witness_right_right_right