Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall b c L t B C i. (((forall pfp_repeat_index_before_paddingzeros. (exists pfa_gap_before_paddingzerosindex. pfa_gap_before_paddingzerosindex + S (pfp_repeat_index_before_paddingzeros) = (t)) -> (((exists ff_h_pfp_before_paddingzerosentry. ff_h_pfp_before_paddingzerosentry + S (0) = S ((S (pfp_repeat_index_before_paddingzeros)) * C)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_before_paddingzerosentry. B = ff_q_pfp_before_paddingzerosentry * S ((S (pfp_repeat_index_before_paddingzeros)) * C) + (0)))) /\ ((forall pfrep_index_before_padding pfrep_value_before_padding. (exists pfa_gap_before_paddingbound. pfa_gap_before_paddingbound + S (pfrep_index_before_padding) = (L)) -> (((exists ff_h_pfp_before_paddinginput. ff_h_pfp_before_paddinginput + S (pfrep_value_before_padding) = S ((S (pfrep_index_before_padding)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_before_paddinginput. b = ff_q_pfp_before_paddinginput * S ((S (pfrep_index_before_padding)) * c) + (pfrep_value_before_padding))) -> (((exists ff_h_pfp_before_paddingoutput. ff_h_pfp_before_paddingoutput + S (pfrep_value_before_padding) = S ((S ((t)+pfrep_index_before_padding)) * C)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_before_paddingoutput. B = ff_q_pfp_before_paddingoutput * S ((S ((t)+pfrep_index_before_padding)) * C) + (pfrep_value_before_padding))))))) -> (exists pfa_gap_before_bound. pfa_gap_before_bound + S (i) = (t)) -> ((((exists pfa_gap_before_zeroinside. pfa_gap_before_zeroinside + S (i) = (t+L)) /\ ((((exists ff_h_pfp_before_zeroentry. ff_h_pfp_before_zeroentry + S (0) = S ((S (i)) * C)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_before_zeroentry. B = ff_q_pfp_before_zeroentry * S ((S (i)) * C) + (0)))))) \/ (((exists pfc_gap_before_zerooutside. pfc_gap_before_zerooutside+(t+L)=(i)) /\ (((0)=0)))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Every position in the actual added leading block has zero extended value zero; no source coefficient is read.
The unchanged tactic script uses 3 declared prerequisites and contains 22 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v33 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
add_assoc Alpha theorem; checked-use authorized add_comm Alpha theorem; checked-use authorized add_succ_left Alpha theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–9
02Separate the logical casesL10–13
03Construct an explicit witnessL14–14
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L14
exists x+L
04Calculate and transport equalitiesL15–17
05Use earlier factsL18–18
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L18
exact hi_witness
06Calculate and transport equalitiesL19–19
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L19
refl
Original exact command ledger · 22 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro L - 0004
intro t - 0005
intro B - 0006
intro C - 0007
intro i - 0008
intro hpad - 0009
intro hi - 0010
cases hpad - 0011
left - 0012
split - 0013
cases hi - 0014
exists x+L - 0015
trans (x+S i)+L - 0016
simp [add_assoc,add_comm,add_succ_left] - 0017
congr - 0018
exact hi_witness - 0019
refl - 0020
specialize hpad_left (i) - 0021
apply hpad_left - 0022
exact hi